AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Physical Education

Ron Ward

PHYSICALEDUCAT · PE31 · TENNISCOACH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Ron Ward may work for students who value knowledgeable coaching, but the small and polarized review set makes him a risky choice.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized coachingKnowledgeable instructorCares about playersAvailability concernsLimited evidence
  • Two reviews praise him as knowledgeable, caring, and a great coach.
  • One review strongly criticizes his availability and attention during coaching.
  • The sample is very small and old, so the overall judgment is uncertain.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

There is not enough grade evidence to call this an easy A, and difficulty ratings are split.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The because one review rates it easy while others rate it demanding or very difficult.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews .

, but none clearly states the policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student gets the engaged, knowledgeable coach described by positive reviews or the absent coach described by the negative review.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, so grading leniency cannot be strongly judged.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not clearly described, but physical education and coaching reviews suggest normal effort rather than written overload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching experience is mixed because two students praise his coaching and knowledge while one reports poor availability.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss teaching and coaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The reviews describe coaching and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not mention formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

coaching and knowledge but one severe complaint about lack of attention.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent coaching presence and attention.

What students said

“He is a great coach!!”
TENNISCOACH
“Extremely knowledgeable.”
PHYSICALEDUCAT
“he rarely comes to the court.”
PE31

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in coaching quality, knowledge, and consistency risk. Credibility rating: Low.

👨‍🏫 Coaching Quality

62/100

“One of the .”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

42/100

“he rarely comes to the court.”

👍 Knowledge

70/100

“Extremely knowledgeable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Coaching

  • He is a great coach!!
  • One of the .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • really care about his players.
  • Extremely knowledgeable.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Availability

  • he's always on the phone while coaching me tennis.
  • he rarely comes to the court.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 old reviews are available, and they are highly polarized with little concrete course detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PE311 review
PHYSICALEDUCAT1 review
TENNISCOACH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values