AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Christopher Storer

PHILSECT · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL04 · PHIL4 · PHIL · PHILO004T · PHIL03 · CRITICALTHINK · P004 · PHILD004 · PHIL004 · PHIL3 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid him unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesPoor structureHard quizzesHeavy readingAvoid if possible
  • Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and .
  • The class because lectures often do not help.
  • , but the learning experience is widely criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students can pass or get an A by reading, but the , and heavy work make the grade costly.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online review evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students describe the course as difficult mainly because the instruction lacks clarity and the material must be learned from the book.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and many comments imply class time is required but not very useful.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students warn against taking him because , and poorly structured.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, but others report hard grading and grade risk.

Format shift

, and they are mixed.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report , and exercises to compensate for .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The dominant pattern is unclear, rambling, off-topic teaching that leaves students confused.

Format shift

, and the teaching feedback is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment includes quizzes, homework or , and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and show a , and difficult quizzes or exams.

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“ and useless.”
PHIL004
“ .”
PHIL4
“Everyone in my class zones out when he talks.”
PHIL04

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often described as difficult or confusing, though some policies such as .

Difficult QuizzesMidterm And FinalMultiple-Choice Or True-False ExamsDropped Quiz Grades

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention hard quizzes, midterms, finals, and multiple-choice or .

Difficult QuizzesMidterm And FinalMultiple-Choice Or True-False ExamsDropped Quiz Grades
“ ”
PHIL4
“The but .”
PHIL03
“Unfortunately all quizzes and true/false.”
PHIL4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN AWAY, RUN AWAY!”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ and useless.”

⚠️ Recommendation Level

12/100

“ .”

📚 Workload And Difficulty

25/100

“Loads of hard work, read all the chap. & do all the exc. fr a good grade, as all the work is 2 b sub.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He meanders, loses both himself and the students, and classes are extremely slow and torturous.
  • He talks in circles and talks with a monotone.
  • Class instruction was difficult to follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This is the absolute most difficult college class I have taken thus far.
  • He grades very hard.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Warnings

  • .
  • Run. Fast.
  • if you value your time!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 36 reviews over many years with a very consistent negative pattern around clarity, structure, and lecture quality.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 513
1 out of 515

Course coverage

PHIL411 reviews
PHIL048 reviews
PHIL0047 reviews
PHIL32 reviews
CRITICALTHINK1 review
Show 7 more courses
P0041 review
PHIL1 review
PHIL031 review
PHILD0041 review
PHILO004T1 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values