AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Michael Cao

MATH10 · MATH1B · MATHD010 · MATH114 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid him unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast Paced LecturesHard ExamsWeak Test AlignmentMixed Teaching Quality
  • Reviews are split, but the strongest comments criticize rushed teaching and .
  • Getting an A looks difficult because one review says no one got an A and another says the .
  • There is no online evidence, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible in some sections, but , and one report that no one got an A make the true cost high.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content becomes challenging because lectures move fast and students say tested material was not taught in detail.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The strongest advice is negative because students complain , and poor test alignment.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

because students mention a , and almost no A grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not the main complaint, but and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is weak overall because several students say he is rushed, unclear, or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Assessment appears exam-heavy, with comments focused on quizzes, midterms, and a final.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but rushed instructor whose exams can feel much harder than lectures or practice work.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures move too fast and .

What students said

“All of and .”
MATH10
“he moves ”
MATH114
“after the final(super hard, class highest is only 67)”
MATH1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are risky because students mention weekly quizzes, hard midterms and finals, and poor alignment with practice work.

Weekly QuizzesNote Sheet AllowedHard MidtermHard FinalUnclear Test Alignment

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams, and very hard midterms or finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Weekly QuizzesNote Sheet AllowedHard Final
“practice quizzes and ”
MATH10
“ , and we can have a sheet of notes on the midterms and final.”
MATH10
“after the final(super hard, class highest is only 67)”
MATH1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Michael is a terrible teacher. All of and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He moves to fast through the subjects and tries to fit everything in even though we were behind 2 weeks.”

⚖️

25/100

“After all, no one got an A in his class, and the highest only few B's.”

🧪

35/100

“All of and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class was great overall
  • and tries hard.
  • he moves

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A :)
  • no one got an A in his class
  • after the final(super hard, class highest is only 67)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews are available, all are old, and the comments are mixed but still give consistent warning signs about pace and exams.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH102 reviews
MATH1141 review
MATH1B1 review
MATHD0101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values