AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Philosophy

Andrew Lavin

PHIL4 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a , but treat the evidence as limited.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeableHelpfulClear SlidesRecommendedResearch Paper
  • Students describe him as knowledgeable and genuinely helpful.
  • The course seems manageable if and the .
  • Evidence is positive but thin because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

A decent grade seems realistic if students do the homework and , but there is no strong easy-A proof.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say and helps them learn, with no comments describing the content as especially hard.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Both reviews are strongly positive and one directly .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

because students must do the research paper and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

The and a research paper, with no heavy-workload complaints.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe him as awesome, knowledgeable, and focused on helping students understand.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The and a research paper, not exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and say the class is useful and manageable.

Main concern

The main concern is limited evidence, not a clear course problem.

What students said

“He is an awesome teacher.”
PHIL4
“As long as you do well on the research paper and .”
PHIL4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is an awesome teacher. I actually learned a lot from his class. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is an awesome teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“ !”

📈 Grade Effort

65/100

“As long as you do well on the research paper and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an awesome teacher.
  • Mr. Lavin is very knowledgeable about his area of study.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • As long as you do well on the research paper and .
  • I actually learned a lot from his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews are available, both from 2014, so the but weakly supported.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL42 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values