AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English

Kristin Conard

EWRTD002 · EWRT00223 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and can handle heavy work with mixed teaching quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkMixed TeachingEssay FocusCareless Grading
  • Reviews are sharply split between one positive learning experience and one strong warning.
  • The course seems manageable in content but heavy in reading and homework.
  • Grading and teaching clarity are the main risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A good grade seems possible, but the work load and A.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is not described as intellectually hard, but the amount of reading and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they disagree on how difficult the course feels.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on tolerance for workload and mixed teaching clarity.

Only in-person evidence exists, and the two reviews conflict strongly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

35/100

One student expects a good grade, but another says she grades carelessly.

Format shift

, and the evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention a lot of and multiple assignments every class.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

, while another says she mumbles and should be avoided.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments emphasize reading, homework, and essay writing rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with one student praising essay instruction and another warning about workload and .

Main concern

Heavy work and inconsistent teaching clarity.

What students said

“Great Teacher. A lot of work, but not very difficult.”
EWRTD002
“60 pages of reading and 2 homework assignments due every class!!”
EWRT00223

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Teacher. A lot of work, but not very difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She mumbles most of the time and grades carelessly!”

📚 Workload

25/100

“60 pages of reading and 2 homework assignments due every class!!”

👍 Recommendation

45/100

“ if you want a good grade, and you're actually interested in learning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Teacher.
  • She mumbles most of the time and grades carelessly!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • A lot of work, but not very difficult.
  • 60 pages of reading and 2 homework assignments due every class!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they give sharply different impressions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EWRT002231 review
EWRTD0021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1