AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Psychology

Charles Charles Ramskov

PSYCH3 · PSYC1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding psychology course and and heavy independent work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery hard psychology classPassionate but disorganizedHeavy reading requiredPoor assignment clarityBetter for majors
  • The course is described as very difficult, especially for psychology students who are not ready for .
  • One review praises his passion and depth, but two reviews strongly criticize his teaching clarity and organization.
  • This is not an easy A path unless the student is ready to read, attend, and use .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but comments say students must read, attend, and possibly rely on in a hard course.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students describe the course as the hardest psychology class and and preparation.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but one review says students must show up or forget it.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Two of three reviews criticize the class strongly, while the positive review recommends it mainly for serious majors.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The comments point to a demanding class , and possibly .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention , and presentations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He is described as passionate and knowledgeable, but , and not teaching well.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention reading, assignments, presentations, and , but do not clearly prove a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and teaching clarity, though one student says he is passionate and academically strong.

Main concern

The main risk is a .

What students said

“Ramskov's Psych 3 class is the hardest .”
PSYCH3
“he is all over the place and .”
PSYCH3
“Very funny and cool. Just not teaching well”
PSYC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ramskov's Psych 3 class is the hardest .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Very funny and cool. Just not teaching well”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“Ramskov's Psych 3 class is the hardest .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“he is all over the place and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ramskov is very passionate.
  • he is all over the place and .
  • Very funny and cool. Just not teaching well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You must do the reading and show up for class or forget it.
  • if you are an academic wimp do the .
  • Ramskov's Psych 3 class is the hardest .

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Fit

  • Definitely, for majors he will prepare you to the max.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 old reviews are available, and the comments conflict between one strong positive and two strong negatives.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH32 reviews
PSYC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values