AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mary Cox

CHM1A · CHEM1B · CHEM001B · AA · CHEM1A · CHEM1C · CHEM50 · CHEMA · CHEM501A · CHEM10 · ACHEM · CHEM · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you can fully teach yourself chemistry and accept serious grade risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid at all costsDoes not teach clearlyVery hard examsHarsh gradingSelf-teaching required
  • Students and do not prepare them for exams.
  • Grades are described as , and damaging even for strong students.
  • The course requires heavy self-teaching with little useful support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A is described as nearly impossible because , and students report low class averages.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The chemistry content becomes much harder because and students say they must learn the material alone.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though one review says she does not know who attends.

, and the evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

because they say she does not teach and damages grades.

All , and it is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students report no curve, no , little partial credit, and grades that feel unfair or unclear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students , and heavy self-study demands.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Most , and not useful for learning chemistry.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear , and homework, with exams causing the most grade risk.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with , and GPA risk.

Main concern

Students say the class becomes self-taught and very hard to pass well.

What students said

“The only way you'll get a good grade in this class is if you know the material from someone else.”
CHEM1B
“ ! she does not teach..!”
CHEM1A
“ lecture.”
CHEM50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and frequent quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Hard MidtermsLow Test AveragesPop QuizzesLittle Partial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict grading, but exam book or proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Hard MidtermsLow Test AveragesPop QuizzesLittle Partial Credit
“Her lectures are boring and the mid-terms are hella tough.”
CHEM1A
“Test averages are under 50%.”
CHEM1B
“She does not give .”
CHEM50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you get !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She does and definitely is NOT easy.”

⚖️

5/100

“There is no curve, no , no mercy - you are going to get an F.”

🧪

10/100

“Our class avgs for tests were 54 57 and 48.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She clearly, and sometimes she can take the whole lecture .
  • You will HAVE to learn the material on your own.
  • She expects you to essentially teach yourself the class.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • last quarter no body got an A in her class
  • Most people get Cs or Ds.
  • A students, prepare to get a B in her class.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • IF YOU VALUE YOUR GPA.
  • Do not walk, RUN away from this prof!
  • ! she does not teach..!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 50 detailed in-person reviews across many years show a highly consistent negative pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 512
2 out of 523
1 out of 547

Course coverage

CHEM1A16 reviews
CHEM1B13 reviews
CHEM507 reviews
CHEM103 reviews
ACHEM2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
CHEM001B2 reviews
CHEMA2 reviews
AA1 review
CHEM1 review
CHEM1C1 review
CHEM501A1 review
CHM1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values