AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English

Marcy Diehl

EWRT1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

The single review is very positive, but use caution because the evidence base is only one comment.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHighly RecommendedKnowledgeableStrong Writer
  • The only review is strongly positive and says the professor knows the material.
  • The student loved the class and recommends it broadly.
  • There is not enough evidence .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The review gives a medium difficulty rating but does not provide grade or workload evidence for an easy A.

No online evidence is available; the only .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course appears manageable from one positive medium-difficulty review, but there is not enough detail to call it easy.

No online evidence is available; the only .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

No online evidence is available; the only .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The only student strongly recommends the class and says they loved it.

No online evidence is available; the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is , so as unknown and neutral.

Format shift

No online evidence is available; the only .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review gives no clear workload details beyond a medium difficulty rating.

Format shift

No online evidence is available; the only .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

The student praises her knowledge, class quality, and writing ability in a strongly positive review.

Format shift

No online evidence is available; the only .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly prove whether the course .

Format shift

No online evidence is available; the only .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only in-person review praises her knowledge, class experience, and writing ability.

Main concern

The sample size is .

What students said

“I absolutely loved her class and !”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I absolutely loved her class and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the and teaching; credibility rating: Low.

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“I absolutely loved her class and !”

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Professor Diehl knows what she is talking about.”

✍️ Writing Strength

86/100

“Plus she is an amazing writer:)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Diehl knows what she is talking about.
  • I absolutely loved her class and !

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing

  • Plus she is an amazing writer:)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive signal is useful but not stable enough for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values