AI Rate Professor

English

Jon Ford

ENGLISH1A · EWRT1 · EWRTD001 · EWRT1B · EWRT2 · EWRTB · EWRTA · ENGL1 · EWRT1A · EWRIT1 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Choose him if and can tolerate lots of writing, but avoid if you need organized lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy GraderLots Of WritingBoring LecturesDisorganized GradesRewrite Friendly
  • Students often say the class is not conceptually hard and grades can be improved through rewrites and late flexibility.
  • The main cost , and papers that can pile up quickly.
  • Teaching quality is mixed because many students call him nice and helpful, while others describe boring lectures, disorganization, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is realistic because rewrites, late flexibility, and , but students must keep up with substantial writing.

All evidence comes from In person reviews because there are zero Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The writing content is usually described as not hard, but the volume of .

Only In person reviews exist, and they separate easy concepts from heavy workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but , and participation make showing up useful.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students like the , but many hesitate because lectures are boring, work is heavy, and organization can be weak.

All recommendation evidence comes from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many students mention rewrites, late acceptance, , easy grading, or easy B and A paths.

Format shift

Only In .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention many , and assignments that pile up.

Format shift

Only In person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He is often called nice and helpful, but many reviews describe monotone lectures, disorganization, and .

Format shift

Only In person reviews exist, and they show a split between helpfulness and poor organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is driven , and group discussion work.

Format shift

Only In person reviews describe the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are In person, and the and inconsistent teaching organization.

Main concern

The workload can pile up and grade tracking may feel unreliable.

What students said

“He lets you re-write your essays (2-3X!) until you get a better grade.”
EWRT1A
“his class/work is fairly easy just do not procrastinate because it piles up fast!”
EWRTB
“Unclear and muddled lectures.”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears writing-heavy and and rewrites, but exam proctoring or open-book policy is not clearly proven.

Take-Home EssaysRewrite OpportunitiesMidterm And Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention take-home essays, midterm and , and rewrites, but .

Take-Home EssaysRewrite OpportunitiesMidterm And Final Mentioned
“Easy 4 ”
EWRT1A
“He lets you re-write your essays (2-3X!) until you get a better grade.”
EWRT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He lets you re-write your essays (2-3X!) until you get a better grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Nice guy. Completely horrid teacher. Unclear and muddled lectures.”

⚖️

76/100

“ if you're late in submitting the essay.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Too much work!! 5 take home essays and 2 in class essays for midterm and read 5-6 readings each week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The . at De Anza.
  • Boring, monotonous voice.
  • Unclear and muddled lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • He lets you re-write your essays (2-3X!) until you get a better grade.
  • He's a and will accept late work.
  • not a hard class but lots of . Class was kinda boring and easy B but not very easy A

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots oppurtunites for An A in the class .
  • LOTS OF WORK tho, seriously.
  • You finish writing 1 of 5 essays, and here comes the next!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 33 detailed reviews across many years, though all are old and opinions are mixed.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

EWRT1A17 reviews
EWRT25 reviews
EWRT1B4 reviews
ENGL11 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
Show 5 more courses
EWRIT11 review
EWRT11 review
EWRTA1 review
EWRTB1 review
EWRTD0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values