AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English

Angela Hilton

EWRT2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExamplesCaring TeacherHelpful Office HoursWell OrganizedHighly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe Hilton as , and well prepared.
  • The course looks manageable if students attend, ask questions, and .
  • There is delivery.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Getting an A looks realistic, but students still need to show up, use office hours, and complete assignments.

, so the Easy A evidence comes from classroom comments.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The because and uses class time well.

, and they describe clear classroom instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but comments imply showing up is important for doing well.

Only in-person reviews mention attendance indirectly through class participation and support.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and easy to ask for help.

, and all are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades include A- and B+, with no strong proof of either harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The course requires regular assignments, but students do not describe the workload as heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently praise her examples, preparation, care, and use of class time.

Format shift

, and they are consistently strong.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews mention assignments and writing examples, but .

Format shift

, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is from in-person EWRT2 reviews, and , and strong support.

Main concern

Students still need to attend and complete the work consistently.

What students said

“She ALWAYS provided valid/amazing examples to help her students understand her lesson plan.”
EWRT2
“I felt that she really cared that each student was doing well in the class.”
EWRT2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, book policy, midterms, or finals.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She ALWAYS provided valid/amazing examples to help her students understand her lesson plan.”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“I felt that she really cared that each student was doing well in the class.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made great use of class time and and during her office hours.
  • She also uses class time very wisely and appropriately.

Theme 2

📚 About Course Success

  • Show up to class, attend office hours , and you'll do fine!
  • She showed videos and used many types of writing examples to teach the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

The reviews are consistent and detailed, but there are only three and all are from 2013.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values