AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Physical Education

Debi A. Schafer-Braun

PE6U · PE14 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a positive physical education class where effort feels worthwhile and an A appears realistic.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent workoutsEasy ANice instructorHard but rewardingCreative class
  • Both reviews give perfect quality ratings and strongly positive comments.
  • One review explicitly calls the class an Easy A, while another says she works students hard.
  • Evidence is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

One student directly says Easy A, but another says the workouts were hard, so the A still may require physical effort.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

The class content appears straightforward, but workout intensity can make it physically demanding.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show simple structure with variable physical effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and neither clearly proves attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students are extremely positive, calling the class the and praising her personality and workouts.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

One student earned an A and another directly called it an Easy A.

Format shift

Only in-person grading evidence exists, with no online comparison.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not academically heavy, but students should expect real physical effort.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention hard workouts and lifting weights, with no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Both students give top ratings and describe her as creative, helpful, and nice.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Reviews describe workout participation rather than exams or traditional academic assessments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not mention exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as nice, helpful, creative, and worth taking.

Main concern

The small review count makes the evidence less stable.

What students said

“The !”
PE6U
“Easy A. And she's nice, so that helps too.”
PE14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! Worked us hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workout intensity, and grade outlook. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Was very creative with her workouts.”

📈 Grade Outlook

88/100

“Easy A. And she's nice, so that helps too.”

💪 Workload Reality

48/100

“Worked us hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Was very creative with her workouts.
  • She will answer any questions you have.
  • And she's nice, so that helps too.

Theme 2

💪 About Workouts

  • Worked us hard.
  • Never saw the same workout twice.
  • Cardiovascular and strength development.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Easy A.
  • The !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 old reviews are available, even though both are detailed and very positive.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PE141 review
PE6U1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values