AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English

Sean Donoho

EWRT2 · EWRT1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a fair but demanding English class that and effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard but fairFunny teacherAttendance mattersInsightful literatureReal workload
  • Students describe him as demanding but useful for college preparation.
  • Grades appear fair, but earning an A , and effort.
  • Evidence is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but students say you must pay attention, attend class, and work hard.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course is intellectually and workload-wise demanding, especially for college prep writing and literature.

Only in-person evidence exists, and both reviews describe meaningful challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because quizzes and class activities make absences costly.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Students recommend the experience because , and prepares students well despite the difficulty.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students say you get the grade you deserve, which .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention hard preparation, books every class, quizzes, and enough workload to stay attentive.

Format shift

online comparison.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students describe him as funny, insightful, caring, and demanding for good reasons.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, books, group activity, and workload, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they support a mix of classwork and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but caring teacher who keeps students engaged and prepares them well.

Main concern

The , and steady effort.

What students said

“The professor is hard on you, but its for good reason.”
EWRT2
“ because of the .”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove broader exam policy.

Quizzes
“ because of the .”
EWRT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor is hard on you, but its for good reason.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Very insightful when it comes to the literature.”

⚖️

50/100

“You get the grade you deserve in his class.”

📚 Workload Demand

35/100

“You use all the books every time you go to class so BUY THE BOOKS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super funny teacher that kept me attentive during class with either jokes or workload.
  • Very insightful when it comes to the literature.
  • he cares about the students and subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The professor is hard on you, but its for good reason.
  • if you pay attention you could get an A/B.
  • You get the grade you deserve in his class.

Theme 3

🕒

  • because of the .
  • Lots of group activity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

44/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 old reviews are available, though both are detailed and consistent about difficulty and fairness.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EWRT1A1 review
EWRT21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values