AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Mhaire Fraser

PSYCH001 · PSYC014 · PYSC1 · PSYC8 · PSYCH14 · PSYC14 · PSYC008 · SOCPSYC · PSY001 · PSYCH2113 · PSYCH014 · PSYCH017 · GFHFG8787 · PSCH12 · PSYCH8 · PSYC11 · PSYCH101 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH08 · PSYC001 · PSYC12 · PSYC01201 · PSCH14 · PSYCH4 · PSYCH12 · PSYCH6455 · 92 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are independent, comfortable with blunt criticism, and and unclear structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing TeacherHeavy ReadingHard TestsUnorganized LecturesTake-Home Exams
  • Reviews are deeply split, with some students calling her brilliant and .
  • The course , and self-direction rather than an easy grade path.
  • Common complaints , and a harsh classroom tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and the need to work rather than coast.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they describe a work-heavy path with some and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material and expectations feel challenging because of , and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe college-level difficulty or worse.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

75/100

Attendance is often not strictly enforced, but students say missing class makes the .

Only in-person reviews exist, and several mention liberal or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

The strongest pattern is caution because many students report , and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and the evidence is polarized but heavily risk-focused.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and take-home exams help, but hard tests, vague assignments, and .

Format shift

, and the evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention , and substantial outside work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload complaints are frequent.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some students call her intelligent and inspiring, but many describe lectures as , and unorganized.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the teaching experience is strongly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention both papers and , and projects.

Format shift

and exams appearing often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person and shows a highly polarizing professor with strong intellectual value but major consistency and professionalism complaints.

Main concern

, and unorganized lectures.

What students said

“ .”
PSYCH001
“Very knowledgeable, willing to help, ALWAYS fair.”
PSYCH017
“HER ASSIGMENTS ARE VAGUE AND USELESS, HER CLASS IS A JOKE!”
PSYC14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies because , while others describe hard or and a strict cheating policy.

Take-Home ExamsHard TestsStrict Cheating PolicyPapers And Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a strict cheating policy, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Take-Home ExamsHard TestsStrict Cheating PolicyPapers And Tests
“ .”
PSYCH14
“Strict cheating policy with her tests because they're posted on her website.”
PSYCH8
“ , so show up to class and read everything.”
PSYCH1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is not for the weak or people who want an easy grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“ and off-topic.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“You have to put in the time at home.”

⚖️

48/100

“ but if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable, willing to help, ALWAYS fair.
  • Extremely unprepared, she was late to i think every class.
  • and off-topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Will need to work to get an A, but there are .
  • The and you actually have to read ALL the books
  • If you work hard, you can get a B, no problem.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • .
  • She intimidates you and embarrasses you if you ask about an .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

92

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 in-person reviews over several years with rich detail, though opinions are highly polarized and old.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 58
3 out of 511
2 out of 520
1 out of 525

Course coverage

PSYC148 reviews
PSYCH147 reviews
PSYCH85 reviews
PSYCH123 reviews
PSYC0142 reviews
Show 21 more courses
PSYC122 reviews
PSYCH0012 reviews
PSYCH0172 reviews
PSYCH12 reviews
GFHFG87871 review
PSCH121 review
PSCH141 review
PSY0011 review
PSYC0011 review
PSYC0081 review
PSYC012011 review
PSYC111 review
PSYC81 review
PSYCH0141 review
PSYCH081 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYCH21131 review
PSYCH41 review
PSYCH64551 review
PYSC11 review
SOCPSYC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values