AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ivana Bozidarevic

CHEM1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can keep up with , and difficult exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear But PolarizingHard TestsExtra Credit AvailableHeavy Lab WorkStrict Grading
  • Student opinion and very poor lecture-test alignment.
  • Grades can be helped by , but and lab reports make the A costly.
  • All evidence comes from older in-person CHEM1A reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

can help a lot, but students still , and real chemistry preparation.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mixed between and high effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

CHEM1A is described as concept-heavy, test-heavy, and difficult for students without prior chemistry strength.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some students strongly recommend her for clarity and help, while because exams and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and recommendations are sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

softens grades, but several students still call the grading and tests hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students , and prelab and post-lab reports taking 5 to 8 hours.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with clear and helpful lectures for some students but useless lectures for others.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict strongly.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and labs rather than one single method.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for clarity and help but , and grading.

Main concern

Tests and lab reports can feel much harder than the lectures prepare students for.

What students said

“Her lectures covered the topics in each chapter very clearly and she will answer any questions you have.”
CHEM1A
“ .”
CHEM1A
“she gives LOTS of , fair grader.”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and a comprehensive final, but they do .

Hard TestsComprehensive FinalMultiple Choice Warning

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a comprehensive final, but not clear book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsComprehensive FinalMultiple Choice Warning
“ .”
CHEM1A
“beware of her multiple choice!”
CHEM1A
“the and you're quite limited for time”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Her lectures covered the topics in each chapter very clearly and she will answer any questions you have.”

⚖️

35/100

“She is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“writing prelab and post lab reports take about 5-8 hrs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very helpfull
  • Great teacher. and energetic.
  • Lecture is useless

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she gives LOTS of , fair grader.
  • .
  • I am not too great at chem but I still got an A-.

Theme 3

🧪

  • beware of her multiple choice!
  • the and you're quite limited for time
  • writing prelab and post lab reports take about 5-8 hrs.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are 7 detailed but old reviews, with , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values