Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
62/100Getting an A seems possible with lenient moments and , but several and tricky tests.
because there are no online reviews.
FILM60 · FTV1 · SW · FILM · FILMTV60A · FILMSECT · FILM60A · FTV60 · SCRIPTWRITING · TTV60A · FILM2A · ELIT1 · FTV60A · FILM1ELIT · 23 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Getting an A seems possible with lenient moments and extra credit, but several students warn about hard grading and tricky tests.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.
Is the course easy?
The material is mostly basic film and writing structure, but projects and tests can feel harder than expected.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.
Is attendance flexible?
The reviews do not clearly prove whether attendance is optional, recommended, or mandatory.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but attendance policy is not clearly stated.
Is this professor recommended?
Recommendation depends on tolerance for dry lectures, because helpful basics are offset by repeated complaints about boredom and grading.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
52/100
Grading looks mixed, with some students calling her easy and others calling her a hard grader.
Format shift
All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Workload
Moderate
62/100
The workload is not described as overwhelming, but projects and revisions can require real effort.
Format shift
All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Teaching experience
Average
52/100
Students often say she knows the material and can be helpful, but the lecture style is repeatedly called dry, boring, and uninspiring.
Format shift
All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Reviews mention tests, projects, scripts, reports, revisions, and extra credit, so assessment appears mixed.
Format shift
All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, where students describe useful basics but a dry and sometimes frustrating class experience.
Main concern
The main concern is boring lectures with uneven grading and tricky tests.
What students said
“Overall Rines is a good teacher.”
“her lectures are dry and come directly from the handouts”
“tests are EASY with lots of extra credit!”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews mention both easy tests and tricky tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or webcam policies.
Assessment risk
Varies
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention tests, projects, and extra credit, but exam rules are not clearly proven.
“tests are EASY with lots of extra credit!”
“The tests typically had little "gotcha" questions.”
“Lectures are boring, tests tricky-take any one else.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“It's not the most exciting class, but she's actually very nice.”
“Very clear. Very helpful. A little cold.”
“She is an easy grader, so most everybody gets an A or a B.”
“Rines' teaching style is boring. She is monotone.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
23
Recent reviews read by the AI
23
Lifetime ratings
68/100
Evidence confidence
There are 23 reviews with consistent themes, but the evidence is old and many comments lack detailed policy information.
Inside 23 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
1 reported outcomes
No reported values
B 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values