AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Chemistry

Ralf Carrillo

CHEMB · CHEM10 · CHEM30A · CHEM30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will keep up with practice problems and , but do not expect a free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Chemistry LecturesStudy Guide DrivenFair But Effort RequiredMixed Lab Support
  • and helpful study guidance.
  • An A , and study guides, not just showing up.
  • One review reports poor lab support and PowerPoint-heavy teaching, creating a real caution.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible, but students , and study guides.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Chemistry content needs steady practice, even though several students .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention attending class helps, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and fair preparation, but one review strongly criticizes his support.

All but mostly positive tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students call him fair and say high grades come from doing practice .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload centers on homework, , and lab work.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and help, while one review calls the summer class terrible.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are mostly positive with one serious negative outlier.

Assessment method

Balanced

70/100

Assessment appears to combine , and lab work.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly describe clear lectures and help and lecture quality.

Main concern

Students who do not keep up with practice work may struggle.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM30A
“Didn't help with lab because he was doing his thesis in class.”
CHEMB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and study guides, but .

Study Guide Before TestQuizzesTests Require Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides and practice problems, but exam policy is not clearly proven.

Study Guide Before TestQuizzesTests Require Preparation
“ , but he gives you a study guide which is similar to the actual test.”
CHEM30
“He gives you a study guide for .”
CHEM30A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, but definitely a solid B, if you try,”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“Do the chapter problems and you'll get an A.”

⚠️

40/100

“Didn't help with lab because he was doing his thesis in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and willing to help if .
  • !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy B class if you attend class and do the homework.
  • Do the problems at the end of each section to do well on the tests.
  • Not an easy A, but definitely a solid B, if you try,

Theme 3

🧪 About Lab And Support

  • ...not too picky about the lab notebook.
  • Didn't help with lab because he was doing his thesis in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

There are four detailed but old reviews with mostly consistent positive teaching comments and one strong negative outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM101 review
CHEM301 review
CHEM30A1 review
CHEMB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values