AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Child Development

Angela Bur

CD51 · CD10G · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are prepared for a difficult class with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GradingBoring LecturesHigh DifficultyUnclear FairnessLow Recommendation
  • Both reviews are negative or strongly cautious.
  • Students describe the class as difficult and unrewarding.
  • The .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a strong grade appears stressful because one student , and still only a B outcome.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels difficult because reviews report high difficulty, boring book-based teaching, and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

All reviews are in person, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because the experience is described as frustrating and unfair.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

One student says major .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload sounds demanding because a major project required heavy effort and became the main complaint.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Reviews describe the teaching as boring, book-based, and emotionally negative despite acknowledging subject knowledge.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The clearest assessment evidence is a major project, while .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Both reviews are in person and describe a difficult, frustrating experience.

Main concern

Students report , and a very negative classroom experience.

What students said

She is a nightmare.
CD51
.
CD10G
I worked my ass off on a major project, and and accused me of lying about doing it.
CD10G

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A , but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, take-home, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Final MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but exam policy is not clearly proven.

Final MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
I left the , but somehow got a B anyway...whatever.
CD10G

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

.

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

.

⚖️

12/100

I worked my ass off on a major project, and and accused me of lying about doing it.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

She definitely knows her stuff, but basically everything she says is straight from the book...so boring AND useless.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a nightmare.
  • She definitely knows her stuff, but basically everything she says is straight from the book...so boring AND useless.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I worked my ass off on a major project, and and accused me of lying about doing it.
  • I left the , but somehow got a B anyway...whatever.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 old reviews are available, so the negative pattern is concerning but limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD10G1 review
CD511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values