AI Rate Professor

English

Amanda Ghest

ENG1A · EWRT1B · ENG1B · ENGL1B · EWRT1A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid Ghest unless you are a strong, independent writer and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderUnclear expectationsStrict attendanceAvoid warningHeavy reading
  • Most students strongly warn against taking Ghest because and .
  • or absences can seriously hurt grades.
  • A few positive reviews call the class easy, but they are outweighed by many detailed negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few reviews claim easy A, but most comments say harsh grading and .

All because the authoritative online review count is 0.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels hard mainly because , and heavy reading.

, and it strongly points to a challenging experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

and that being late or missing class can count heavily against them.

, and they describe strict rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students directly warn others away because , and harshly graded.

The recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Multiple students say papers are graded very hard and that disagreement or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students mention lots of reading, demanding essays, and pressure .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe her as , and poor at explaining expectations.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The comments , and discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, emphasizing harsh grading, , and weak support.

Main concern

Students say she grades harshly without explaining what she wants.

What students said

“ and doesn't clarify anything.”
EWRT1B
“The . She is very unclear on what .”
ENG1A
“ .”
EWRT1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatReviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or final exam rules.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . If you disagree with her, she will tear you apart.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Poor teaching ability. .”

⚖️

8/100

“ be a very strong writer and a critical reader.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“Run while you still can...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very unclear on what .
  • she .
  • she's tough, mean, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and doesn't clarify anything.
  • No one recieved higher than a C on the .
  • If you want a D or an F in EWRT 1A, be my guest, and !

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Rules

  • She will fail you if you miss class.
  • Being late to class just few minutes will count as a FULL absence.
  • If and be sure to do all the reading required.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

There are 15 detailed reviews from a narrow time span, with strong consistency but possible duplicate or highly polarized comments.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

EWRT1A6 reviews
EWRT1B4 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENG1B1 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values