AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Mathematics

Zlatogorov Edwin

MATH1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

because the only review is negative but has no supporting detail.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery low ratingVery high difficultyInsufficient detail
  • .
  • The review gives the lowest quality rating and highest difficulty rating.
  • There is no .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The as 5 out of 5 and gives no comment suggesting an easy A.

The .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The single review rates MATH1A at maximum difficulty and provides no balancing positive detail.

, so format comparison is not possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only review gives the professor the lowest quality score and offers no positive evidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, but the maximum difficulty rating gives no support for .

Format shift

The only evidence is one in-person review with .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The single review marks the course as extremely difficult, though it does not describe the workload.

Format shift

The only workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The professor receives the lowest quality rating, but the .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review .

Format shift

No assessment-method evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only in-person review rates the professor very poorly and the course as very difficult.

Main concern

There is almost no written evidence beyond the numeric ratings.

What students said

“no comment”
MATH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“no comment”
MATH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“no comment”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, but the written evidence is too thin for strong conclusions. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“no comment”

📈 Course Difficulty

10/100

“no comment”

⚠️ Evidence Quality

12/100

“no comment”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Evidence

  • no comment

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no comment

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

12/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review exists, and its written comment contains no usable detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values