AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Matthew Skowbo

WS1 · WS123 · WIMON101 · WOMON305 · WMN302 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Consider him if you want a , but do not rely on these old and thin reviews for .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful in Office HoursMostly Easy CoursePositive but Vague ReviewsMixed Quality Ratings
  • Most comments describe Skowbo as helpful or awesome, but the evidence is very brief.
  • Course difficulty looks low overall, with one review strongly calling it hard.
  • There is easy it is to earn an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Low difficulty ratings suggest manageable effort, but there is no grade evidence or direct easy A claim.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Most difficulty ratings are very low, though one review says the class was very hard.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mostly suggest easy content with one conflicting hard-course comment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students often call him helpful or awesome, but the ratings and review detail are mixed.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There are no grades or direct grading comments, so .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Light

70/100

Most difficulty ratings are low, but reviews do not describe specific workload demands.

Format shift

conflicting hard-course comment.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Comments repeatedly describe him as .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly explain whether the course .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe him as helpful, but they are old, short, and inconsistent.

Main concern

The main concern , and attendance.

What students said

“If you ever have any questions, go to his .”
WS1
“YEAH SKOWBO! This prof is awesome.”
WIMON101
“It was very "hard" indeed.”
WS123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring rules, or exam difficulty.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you ever have any questions, go to his .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“YEAH SKOWBO! This prof is awesome.”

👍 Helpfulness

68/100

“ ."”

📉 Course Difficulty

74/100

“It was very "hard" indeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • If you ever have any questions, go to his .
  • ."
  • He's too good.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • It was very "hard" indeed.
  • YEAH SKOWBO! This prof is awesome.
  • Skobo is the awesome.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only six old reviews from 2011 are available, and most comments are very short with limited course detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WIMON1012 reviews
WMN3021 review
WOMON3051 review
WS11 review
WS1231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values