AI Rate Professor

English

. Splitter

ENG1A · EWRTIB · EWRT1B · EWRT100 · 1A · ERWT · EWRT100B · EWRT01B · ENGLISH30 · 100B · EWRT65 · EWRT1A · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him only if and ; avoid him if you mainly need an easy grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderWriting-heavyPolarizing teacherHelpful for serious writersUnclear expectations
  • serious writers often praise him, while many others strongly warn against him.
  • Getting an A depends heavily on strong writing, grammar, and matching his expectations.
  • The course is writing-heavy, with essays, readings, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say it requires strong writing, grammar, and careful alignment with his expectations.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is difficult for students who struggle with writing basics, grammar, analytical methods, or .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One review , but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is polarizing, but harsh grading and .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many comments explicitly describe harsh grading, picky grammar expectations, and low confidence in getting an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is writing-heavy, with many essays, readings, and essay-based exams mentioned.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

He receives strong praise for writing expertise and feedback, but many students report and poor experiences.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and writing assignments, with essay-based midterms and finals in some courses.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a high-risk, polarizing writing course with and strong payoff for motivated writers.

Main concern

, and heavy writing make the class risky for grade-focused students.

What students said

“you need to write a lot and be a good writer to get an A in his class.”
EWRT1B
“ ; the teaching style is bad; !!”
EWRT100B
“He's the .”
EWRT01B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essay-based and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Essay-Based MidtermEssay-Based FinalTough ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essay-based midterms, finals, and open-book policies.

Essay-Based MidtermEssay-Based FinalTough Exams
“plus an and final.”
ENG1A
“ .”
1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you need to write a lot and be a good writer to get an A in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

18/100

“ ; the teaching style is bad; !!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Difficulty

38/100

“do not expect u can get an A in this class”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing Demands

  • you need to write a lot and be a good writer to get an A in his class.
  • all .
  • to get an A from the book.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • him!!!
  • . .
  • I wasn't expecting a D grade....from this teacher

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • If you are truly interested in improving your writing, research . Splitter.
  • very his class
  • Most students don't understand his teaching style.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 24 reviews with detailed evidence, but the data is old and highly polarized.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

EWRT1B6 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
EWRT100B3 reviews
100B2 reviews
1A2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH301 review
ERWT1 review
EWRT01B1 review
EWRT1001 review
EWRT1A1 review
EWRT651 review
EWRTIB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values