AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Law

Gayle Mozee

PARA065X · PARA91A · PARA · ETHICS · PARA88 · PARA94 · PARAPARA · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a practical law class with and student-friendly tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReal-world teachingClear assignmentsOpen-note testsExperienced lecturerLow textbook burden
  • Students consistently describe her as knowledgeable, experienced, and engaging.
  • The course is usually manageable if students attend class and .
  • , making assessment risk low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A appears very realistic with , and and easy tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

73/100

The material is practical and manageable, though some compressed courses cover a lot quickly.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but students repeatedly say going to class and taking notes matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes long classes engaging.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Open-note tests, easy finals, and follow the class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most reviews mention notes, handouts, and manageable assignments, with only and busy work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly , and connected to real legal work.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment appears , and tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students , and open-note tests.

Main concern

Some night classes are long and one student found the lecture pace too fast.

What students said

“ , and offers open note exams.”
PARA94
“ , and you'll do great!”
PARA94
“Lecture delivery was too fast,hard to keep up with.”
PARA065X

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and an easy final, making exam risk low.

Open-Note TestsEasy FinalFew Test Questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as open-note or easy, though one review warns that few .

Open-Note TestsEasy FinalFew High-Value Questions
“ .”
PARA94
“The .”
PARA
“ but very few questions, one T/ .”
PARA94

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have taken many classes with her and truly enjoy her real world teaching style.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She is very experienced as a paralegal and now manages a law office in SF.”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“ .”

📝

90/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you actually made learning fun.
  • , and offers open note exams.
  • She has a bunch of interesting stories and examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and you'll do great!
  • The .
  • Easy topic and she makes it easier with lots of and easy testing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews are detailed and consistent, but they are old and lack grade data.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PARA944 reviews
PARA3 reviews
ETHICS1 review
PARA065X1 review
PARA881 review
Show 2 more courses
PARA91A1 review
PARAPARA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values