AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Intercultural Studies

Cozetta Guinn

ARTS2F · ICS16B · ART2 · ICS05 · ICS5 · ICS16A · HIST18B · HIST16B · HIST16A · ICS11 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you only want a possible easy grade and can tolerate very poor organization.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery disorganizedUnclear assignmentsConfusing testsPoor classroom managementOccasional easy A
  • Most , and weak teaching.
  • Some students found the class easy to pass because of or .
  • Exam and errors and unclear standards.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A few art reviews call it an easy A with major extra credit, but , and even one fail.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material itself often sounds manageable, but , and off-topic teaching make the course harder than it should be.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though several reviews imply frequent in-class confusion and unclear class structure.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly discourage taking her because they found the class disorganized, unclear, and frustrating.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Some students mention easy grading and , but , and mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload does not sound consistently heavy, but , and books make the effort feel inefficient.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and unable to run lectures well.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention papers, projects, quizzes, midterms, finals, videos, books, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, mainly citing disorganization, unclear teaching, and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they could not understand expectations or learn from the class.

What students said

“ and forgetful.”
ICS16A
“If you just want to .”
ARTS2F
“RUN AWAY.”
ICS05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with one take-home exam report but .

Take-Home Midterm And Final MentionedUnclear Test CoverageTest Errors ReportedQuiz And Test Expectations Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention take-home exams in one course, but other reviews describe , and test errors.

Take-Home Exams MentionedUnclear Test CoverageMidterm Copy ErrorTest Errors
“Both the midterm and and therefore easy.”
ICS16B
“her "Mid-Term" ”
ART2
“She forgot 1 page of the midterm and part of it was not copied correctly.”
ICS11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am an A student with a passion for the Arts already, and I found her to be the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ . No structure to lectures.”

⚖️

34/100

“you are never sure how she grades”

📈 Easy A Signal

62/100

“This is definitely an esay A class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and tardy.
  • No structure to lectures.
  • the professor doesn't teach anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This is definitely an esay A class!
  • she gave !!!
  • Class ended on 3/28 and i'm still waiting for .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • RUN AWAY.
  • !!!!!
  • Save yourself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has 27 in-person reviews across several years with highly consistent complaints, though the data is old.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 57
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ARTS2F7 reviews
HIST16B5 reviews
HIST18B3 reviews
ICS052 reviews
ICS112 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ICS16A2 reviews
ICS16B2 reviews
ICS52 reviews
ART21 review
HIST16A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Fail 1