AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Reginald Hamer

PRECA49A · MATH5 · MATH051 · MATH51 · MATH049A · MATH · MATH049B · MATH105 · MATH112 · MATH210 · MATH49A · ALGEBRA · MATH114 · MATH49B · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a manageable grade and can teach yourself when lectures fail.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy testsStrict attendanceSelf-teaching riskBoring lecturesExtra credit
  • The course is often described as easy, but learning quality is very inconsistent.
  • Many students say tests and .
  • Strict attendance, mandatory notes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A , and showing up, but poor teaching can still make it costly for weaker students.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students repeatedly call the material and tests easy, especially in lower-level math courses.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple students say attendance, notes, roll, or packets were enforced.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

but often warn against him for real learning.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades can , and , though some students complain about strict point rules.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Homework and notes are regular requirements, but students often describe them as easy or .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Reviews are split between patient, helpful teaching and strong complaints that .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students mention homework packets, notes, and , but tests and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

All evidence comes from in-person classes, where students report easy tests but uneven teaching and strict class rules.

Main concern

because many students found lectures boring or unclear.

What students said

“Easy A. as long as you do all the homeworks. .”
MATH51
“you have to teach yourself everything because he tries to make everything difficult”
MATH051
“ .”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and multiple-choice formats, but do not clearly prove open-book or .

Easy TestsMultiple Choice TestsScantron TestsIn-Person Final

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy tests, scantron or multiple-choice exams, and a proctoring rules.

Easy TestsMultiple Choice TestsScantron TestsFinal Exam
“Easy tests.”
MATH49B
“About 5 tests. 20 pts each. All scantron.”
MATH49A
“Tests and and easy.”
MATH105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ...BUT NOT IF U ARE GOING TO PURUSE A CAREER IN MATH”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He takes time to make sure you understand.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“ !”

⚠️ Self-Teaching Risk

52/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches extremely well, and detail.
  • He does not make things clear when you ask him a question.
  • his lecture is boring and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. as long as you do all the homeworks.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

📌

  • strict with attendance.
  • .
  • but he gives a bit of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 in-person reviews cover many courses over several years, though the data is old and opinions are polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 517
3 out of 511
2 out of 515
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH519 reviews
MATH1128 reviews
MATH2108 reviews
MATH1056 reviews
MATH49B4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH1143 reviews
MATH49A3 reviews
1121 review
2101 review
ALGEBRA1 review
MATH1 review
MATH049A1 review
MATH049B1 review
MATH0511 review
MATH51 review
PRECA49A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1