Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
64/100An A is realistic if , and keep up, but several reviews warn that tests and .
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .
ANTHLAB · ANTHR1 · ANTHR02 · ANTH1L · ANTH001 · ANTH2 · ANTHL1 · ANTRO1 · ANTH002 · 12 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is realistic if you attend, take notes, and keep up, but several reviews warn that tests and assignments require work.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.
Is the course easy?
The content is made understandable by clear lectures, but lecture-heavy tests and concepts keep it from being truly easy.
Only in-person reviews exist, and they show a mix of easy and challenging experiences.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance may not be formally required, but students say lecture notes are essential for exams.
Only in-person evidence is available, and it shows attendance is practically important.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend her because she is clear, knowledgeable, interesting, and fair to students who keep up.
Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
58/100
Grading appears fair rather than generous because students must attend, take notes, and avoid missing quizzes or assignments.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews discuss grading, and they point to effort-based outcomes.
Workload
Moderate
55/100
Workload is moderate, with tests, quizzes, labs, an essay, and note-heavy lecture preparation mentioned.
Format shift
All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Teaching experience
Excellent
90/100
Students repeatedly describe her lectures as clear, interesting, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews are available, and teaching comments are strongly positive overall.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
78/100
Grades are driven mainly by tests and quizzes, with some essays, labs, and assignments also mentioned.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews describe assessment, and they emphasize lecture-based tests.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews describe a strong lecturer whose tests are tied closely to class notes and lecture material.
Main concern
Missing class can hurt because slides may not be posted and tests are lecture-based.
What students said
“Class is somewhat dry and hard but if you work hard you can get an A.”
“Tests are all from the powerpoint notes.”
“Lectures were very clear and interesting.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Exams are standard and lecture-based, with no clear evidence of open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews show lecture-based tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.
“Tests are all from the powerpoint notes.”
“Tests are multiple choice and difficult, so be prepared.”
“Her tests are based on lectures so don't skip class.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Marin is the best prof. I have had at De Anza so far! Take her if you want to learn something.”
“Lectures were very clear and interesting.”
“Class is somewhat dry and hard but if you work hard you can get an A.”
“Tests are all from the powerpoint notes.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
12
Recent reviews read by the AI
12
Lifetime ratings
78/100
Evidence confidence
There are 12 detailed and consistent reviews across several courses, though all are older.
Inside 12 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
0 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values