AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Fine Arts

M Shaw

ART4A · ART004A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can handle unclear direction, high material costs, and a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear assignmentsHeavy supplies costLots of homeworkMandatory attendance
  • Students describe the teacher as nice but disorganized and forgetful.
  • The class has lots of homework, projects, in-class drawing, and .
  • Extra materials are a major cost concern and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A fair or , but , and required materials keep the A from feeling easy.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The course is challenging because students mention lots of , and poor timing.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because the organization, assignment clarity, workload, and material costs are major problems.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

One student calls her a , but there is not .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because students mention lots of homework, projects, in-class drawing, and extra materials.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Students describe her as nice but , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy because comments focus on homework, projects, and in-class drawing rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a disorganized drawing class with , and surprise material costs.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and extra supply costs.

What students said

“TEACHER-nice/casual/disorganized/fairly easy grader CLASS-lots of .”
ART4A
“ and forgetful. .”
ART004A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and forgetful. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and costs. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“ and forgetful.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“CLASS-lots of .”

💸 Cost Concern

20/100

“I spent about $150 total in that class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and forgetful.

Theme 2

📦 About Workload And Materials

  • Does not give enough time for , and gives too much time for the quick&easy ones.
  • More materials/supplies needed than she mentions@beginning of quarter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though both give consistent concerns about organization and workload.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART004A1 review
ART4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values