AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English As A Second Language

Andrea LI

ESL251 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
2/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle a difficult class with little support, but note that the evidence is only one old review.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery NegativeHeavy HomeworkMean ToneHigh DifficultyLow Confidence
  • The only review is strongly negative about teaching and personality.
  • The student reports lots of and a very difficult class.
  • Credibility is low because the evidence is one old review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

The only student describes the class as very difficult with lots of , so getting an A appears very hard.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course is rated at maximum difficulty and described as full of .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

Evidence , and it does not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student strongly dislikes the professor and says friends also hate the class.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The review , but the and maximum difficulty suggest a harsh student experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

The student directly reports lots of .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only student calls her a bad teacher, mean, and widely disliked by friends in the class.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only specific assessment evidence is lots of .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review describes the professor as mean and the homework as heavy and tricky.

Main concern

The review reports a very poor teaching experience and lots of .

What students said

I never meet such a BAD teacher before!She just like talking to men!And she give us lotsss of tricky HW!Also she is so mean!!!
ESL251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

I never meet such a BAD teacher before!She just like talking to men!And she give us lotsss of tricky HW!Also she is so mean!!!

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

I never meet such a BAD teacher before!

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

And she give us lotsss of tricky HW!

👍 Recommendation Risk

5/100

All my friends who take her class hate her very much!!!

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I never meet such a BAD teacher before!
  • Also she is so mean!!!

Theme 2

📚

  • And she give us lotsss of tricky HW!
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • All my friends who take her class hate her very much!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, even though its negative tone is very strong.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL2511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values