AI Rate Professor

English

Gary Garvin

ENGLISH1A · EWRT1 · EWRT1B · EWRT2 · EWRT212 · EWRT100B · EWRTA · EWRT211 · EWRT1A · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid him unless , and a demanding writing class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing TeacherVague InstructionsHard Essay GraderCares About ImprovementAttendance Matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who felt supported and .
  • Many negative reviews mention vague instructions, boring lectures, and .
  • Positive reviews say and rewards effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students say effort can earn a good grade, but many warn that and expectations are vague.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The writing content itself may be manageable, but and demanding essay standards make the course feel hard.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because in-class exercises affect passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is weak because , and classroom tone outweigh the positive support comments.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, though one positive review says he grades heavily on effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

The , and in-class exercises that require consistent attendance.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

and care, but many negative reviews describe vague, boring, intimidating, or unhelpful teaching.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and in-class exercises rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, and the pattern is highly polarized with and clarity.

Main concern

Vague instructions and .

What students said

“Very hard to get an A on the essays.”
ENGLISH1A
“He is vague and boring during descussion/lecture”
EWRT1B
“Really wants you to improve and gives lots of .”
EWRT1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a exam format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and class exercises, and do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The is to find another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“He is vague and boring during descussion/lecture”

⚖️

30/100

“Very hard to get an A on the essays.”

❤️ Positive Minority

55/100

“Really wants you to improve and gives lots of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about what he is trying to teach you and is there to help you every step of the way.
  • He demands a lot and .
  • this guy doesn't knoe how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very hard to get an A on the essays.
  • he grades alot off of effort.
  • Bad teacher, bad habits and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • he is very interuptive and makes it very hard to focus in his class.
  • it was so dreadful going to class everyday because of him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are 16 reviews with strong but polarized signals, and the evidence is old with limited detailed grade data.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

EWRT1A4 reviews
EWRT1B4 reviews
EWRT100B2 reviews
ENGLISH1A1 review
EWRT11 review
Show 4 more courses
EWRT21 review
EWRT2111 review
EWRT2121 review
EWRTA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values