AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Chris Lepe

ESC01 · ES001 · ES1 · ESI1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

Take him for an easy environmental studies requirement, but expect mixed teaching quality and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy classHelpful personalityPowerPoint-heavyMandatory attendanceMixed teaching quality
  • Students consistently describe the course as easy with and .
  • Many students like him personally and find him helpful and passionate.
  • Several reviews criticize his teaching as PowerPoint-heavy and disconnected.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The class is low difficulty with limited homework, group projects, and , but steady work and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly call the course easy, with simple assignments and low intellectual difficulty.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe low difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple reviews say attendance, participation, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students like his personality and easy workload, but teaching complaints make the recommendation depend on expectations.

Only in-person reviews exist, with sharply mixed recommendation tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The course seems easy and has , but one student calls him an and others stress steady work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Reviews mention , and generally easy coursework.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is often described as helpful and passionate, but several students say his teaching is weak and PowerPoint-driven.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews mention homework, group projects, participation, and , with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support, but teaching quality is uneven.

Main concern

Students complain that the class can rely too much on PowerPoint and mandatory participation.

What students said

“ if you have nothing better to do.”
ES001
“Everything is on a PowerPoint”
ES001
“Attendance and .”
ES1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, attendance, and participation, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have nothing better to do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Great teacher! and passionate about what he's teaching!”

📈 Easy Workload

82/100

“ and a bunch of .”

⚠️ Main Concern

58/100

“Everything is on a PowerPoint, and lack of connection to students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher! and passionate about what he's teaching!
  • The whole class is a PowerPoint.
  • He is a nice guy, but not good at teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you have nothing better to do.
  • Lots of opportunities with a limit.
  • Attendance and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Mr. Lepe was an awesome teacher!
  • and a !
  • Nice guy, horrendous teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are 9 reviews with some detailed agreement on workload, but the sample is small and old.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ES14 reviews
ES0013 reviews
ESC011 review
ESI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values