AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jillian Yenner

NURS84 · NURS84L · NUR0231 · NURSC84 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Only take her if you can handle inconsistent guidance and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedHelpful when presentUnclear gradingMixed clinical experienceSupportive but inconsistent
  • Reviews are and serious organization complaints.
  • The strongest concerns are , and weak paperwork grading.
  • Positive reviews praise her kindness, support, knowledge, and post-clinical learning exercises.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades do not appear impossible, but and inconsistent guidance make earning an A uncertain.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The clinical content itself is not clearly described as extremely hard, but the experience becomes harder when guidance is weak.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they focus more on instructor support than course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do , but they do mention instructor lateness and inconsistent presence.

All format evidence is in person, with no online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is weak because serious complaints about organization, empathy, and guidance outweigh the limited positive praise.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the tone is sharply mixed but more risky than reassuring.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

A key review says she grades paperwork poorly and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not describe a heavy workload, but clinical paperwork and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Some students praise her support and knowledge, but others describe her as , and lacking empathy.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The and post-conference learning rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

praise but serious complaints about organization and guidance.

Main concern

Students report flakiness, late arrivals, little guidance, and .

What students said

“ , and knowledgeable.”
NURS84
“ and comes in late often.”
NURSC84
“She does a poor job of ”
NURS84L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention clinical paperwork and post-clinical learning, but .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and comes in late often.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, organization, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ , and knowledgeable.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

36/100

“If she shows up for clinical you are lucky!”

⚖️

35/100

“She does a poor job of , however, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jillian was a wonderful teacher.
  • and had great post-conference group learning exercises
  • and comes in late often.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She does a poor job of , however, and .
  • okkk

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Empathy

  • , and knowledgeable.
  • She has no empathy for students.
  • For our rotation, she was WONDERFUL!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 old reviews are available, and the comments are inconsistent across rotations.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NURS84L2 reviews
NUR02311 review
NURS841 review
NURSC841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values