AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kin Lee

MATH1C1D · MATH1C · MATH1CD · MATH · 1C · MATH2B · MATHS · MATH1D · MATH001D · MATH1B · MATHS1C · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you mainly want a low-effort grade and can teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery easy gradingPoor lecturerSelf-study requiredOpen-book testsExtra credit heavy
  • Grades can be easy because of , and .
  • Many students say .
  • The course fits students who can learn math on their own.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A often seems easy because of , and generous curves, but some students still warn that weak teaching can force self-study.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The grading and , but the math can feel .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

75/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and some students describe entering, leaving, or treating class casually.

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

, while many strongly criticize the teaching quality.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Grades appear very lenient because students mention , and an .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Work sounds manageable because , though students may need outside study to learn.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most negative comments say he mumbles, talks to the board, gives unclear lectures, or leaves students learning little.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment mixes exams, quizzes, take-home work, notes, textbooks, and rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but weak lectures that often require self-study.

Main concern

Students often say they learn little from lecture.

What students said

“ .”
MATH1D
“he sucks at teaching, you learn nothing.”
MATH1C
“the .. like 90% of the class gets an A.”
MATH2B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as , although some students still call them hard.

Open BookOpen NotesTake-Home QuizzesTake-Home ExamExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments explicitly mention open-book tests, , and .

Open BookOpen NotesTake-Home QuizzesTake-Home ExamExtra Credit
“ .”
MATH1D
“ but all are open notes and books, and as well.”
MATH1C
“B is gauranteed cuz of .”
MATH1D

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a self-paced class, you don't need the teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“he sucks at teaching, you learn nothing.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

88/100

“the .. like 90% of the class gets an A.”

🧪

84/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He tends to talk to the board and, when explaining handouts, just reads them aloud.
  • hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • If you complete your work, you will get a good grade in the class.
  • the .. like 90% of the class gets an A.
  • only needed 60 or so for A.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • and .
  • but all are open notes and books, and as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 20 reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and many are brief.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1C6 reviews
MATH1D3 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH1C1D2 reviews
1C1 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH001D1 review
MATH1B1 review
MATH1CD1 review
MATH2B1 review
MATHS1 review
MATHS1C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1