AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Mathematics

Tim Carlson

MATH61 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the missing material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CoverageLazy TeachingHomework Gap
  • The review says lectures do not cover enough material.
  • .
  • The only positive note is that he is laid back.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A likely requires extra self-study because .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels harder because lecture coverage .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The review strongly criticizes his teaching coverage and work expectations.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is no direct grading evidence, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

because lectures do not cover enough material.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The student says he spends too much time on one problem and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only assessment-related evidence points .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and unsupported homework expectations.

Main concern

Students may need to learn material independently because lectures do not cover enough.

What students said

“ problem from a chapter and expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy”
MATH61

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or requirements.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ problem from a chapter and expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the main complaint about teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ problem from a chapter and expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy”

📚 Workload Fit

30/100

“expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • problem from a chapter and expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy

Theme 2

📈

  • expects u to complete the though his lecture didnt cover everything...he is laid back but lazy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but it gives a specific complaint about lecture coverage.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values