Is this an easy A?
HardWork
32/100An A is possible for some students through objectives or , but repeated failing exam averages make it a high-effort path.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .
BIO6A · BIO06 · BIO1A · BIO101B · BIO6C · BIOL6B6C · BIOL6A · BIOL11 · 12 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is possible for some students through objectives or extra credit, but repeated failing exam averages make it a high-effort path.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.
Is the course easy?
The biology content is made harder by detailed memorization, old material on tests, and unclear lectures.
All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly prove mandatory attendance, and one student says lectures add little beyond emailed notes.
Only in-person reviews mention lecture value; there is no online evidence.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students warn against taking him because teaching is unclear and exams are harsh.
The recommendation signal comes entirely from in-person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
18/100
Students repeatedly report failing exam averages and overly specific tests, though extra credit may help some grades.
Format shift
All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Workload
Moderate
45/100
Reviews focus more on exam difficulty and memorization than on constant homework or lab workload.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews discuss workload-related pressure.
Teaching experience
Awful
22/100
Most comments describe him as disorganized, hard to understand, unprepared, or ineffective despite a few positive notes.
Format shift
All teaching-quality evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
88/100
Student comments center on exams, test averages, objectives, and detailed test preparation rather than assignments.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews describe assessment methods.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganization, unclear delivery, and extremely hard exams.
Main concern
Students may need to teach themselves while preparing for very specific exams.
What students said
“Do not, under any circumstances, take this guy!”
“Over half of the class is failing because he tests on old material and is too specific than focusing on concepts”
“Mumbles throughout class. Unprepared. Unhelpful.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews clearly describe very hard, detail-heavy exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.
Assessment risk
Strict
24/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews describe harsh exams based on lists, old material, and specific details, with several reports of failing averages.
“Half of the class got F's.”
“Very hard on exams and extra credit.”
“You MUST be able to write down the 17 steps in DNA replication.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Do not, under any circumstances, take this guy!”
“Mumbles throughout class. Unprepared. Unhelpful.”
“Over half of the class is failing because he tests on old material and is too specific than focusing on concepts”
“Class avg on exams = F!”
“Seriously, don't take him. Run away!”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Theme 4
Data context
Analysis sample
12
Recent reviews read by the AI
12
Lifetime ratings
66/100
Evidence confidence
Twelve detailed but old in-person reviews are highly consistent, though there are no recent or online comments.
Inside 12 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
0 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values