AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Byron Burkhalter

PSYCH10 · SOC1 · SOC001 · SOCIOLOGY · INTROSOCIOLOGY · SOC10 · SOC01 · SOCIO01 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a lively, challenging class and can handle an unconventional lecture style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThought-Provoking LecturesUnconventional StyleEngaging DiscussionsLenient GradingNeeds Self-Direction
  • Students consistently describe him as engaging, smart, and memorable.
  • The class pushes students to think, but lectures can wander and .
  • Grades seem manageable if , and complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A seems realistic if , and complete the .

All evidence comes from in person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

The content is not technically brutal, but he expects students to think independently and follow open-ended discussions.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but comments make class presence and note-taking sound important.

Only in .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because his lectures are engaging, memorable, and intellectually useful despite the loose structure.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

77/100

Students describe points-based grading and examples where steady work could still lead to a .

Format shift

Only in .

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The workload appears manageable, centered on attending, taking notes, reading, and doing assigned work.

Format shift

Only in person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students praise his knowledge and energy, but several mention tangents, unclear expectations, or an unusual style.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and class work, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Only in person reviews mention assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews describe a smart, engaging professor whose class is thought-provoking but sometimes scattered.

Main concern

His tangents and structure.

What students said

“he keeps the class alive and gets into your head making you really expand your mind.”
SOCIO01
“Very unconventional and thought provoking but he began concepts without finishing them and .”
SOC01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and hard or , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book policy.

Tests Every Few WeeksUnclear Exam ExpectationsPossibly Hard Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention tests every few weeks and , but no clear proctoring or book policy is proven.

Tests Every Few WeeksUnclear Exam ExpectationsHard Exams Mentioned
“Some may and is a smart ass”
SOC1
“Tests every 3 weeks”
SOC1
“ .”
SOC01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this teacher is really cool. i never got bored in his class. he's really good at his subject and gives great lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He's an interesting character that's for sure.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“ ”

⚖️

77/100

“even if you dont ace all your tests, you can still pass with an a(like me)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teaching, should more stick to an outline for each class, knows a lot, sometimes gets distracted
  • Most of class is ussually long stories or discussions.
  • He has a tendency to go off on tangents, however.

Theme 2

🧠 About Thinking Challenge

  • he keeps the class alive and gets into your head making you really expand your mind.
  • makes you really think
  • Hard, but .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • the class is easy if you pay attention to the lectures and do all the work.
  • I got F on all of my test but kept doing my work and he gave me a C.
  • Tests every 3 weeks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and often lack grade and policy details.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC14 reviews
SOC0013 reviews
SOC103 reviews
PSYCH102 reviews
SOCIOLOGY2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
INTROSOCIOLOGY1 review
SOC011 review
SOCIO011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values