AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · English As A Second Language

Molino Tor

ESL251 · ESL244 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you care about useful instruction, clear value, or a realistic chance at an A.

Best fit · Budget FirstUseless LessonsHarsh A BarrierPoor TeachingTextbook WasteStrict Attendance
  • Students repeatedly say the lessons feel useless or ineffective.
  • The course content may be easy, but getting an A is described as very hard.
  • Students complain about wasted textbooks, poor materials, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Multiple students explicitly say getting an A is impossible or .

All evidence comes from in person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The lessons are described as easy, but that does not translate into easy grades or useful learning.

Only in person reviews describe the course content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

One student says students must attend every class and cannot miss more than two classes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

because they see the teaching as useless and the grading as unrewarding.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students directly say it is impossible or very hard to get an A from him.

Format shift

Only in .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not described as massive, but and poor class value make the effort feel unrewarding.

Format shift

Only in person reviews describe workload pressure.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he teaches himself, uses weak materials, and fails to create useful learning.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so the assessment mix cannot be proven.

Format shift

In person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Budget First

In person reviews are mostly negative, focusing on poor teaching, wasted materials, and .

Main concern

Students say the class wastes time and money while making an A very difficult.

What students said

“His classes are useless.I didn't learn anything from him. !”
ESL244
“if you want to get an A, .”
ESL251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His classes are useless.I didn't learn anything from him. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He seems to be teaching himself.”

🚫 Recommendation Level

10/100

“ !”

⚖️ Grade Difficulty

8/100

“if you want to get an A, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I don't like the way he teach, the lessons seems useless to me.
  • His classes are useless.I didn't learn anything from him.
  • he treat students like that they knew everything already

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Attendance

  • But it's impossible to get A from him.
  • he is so hard that you have to go to his class every time and don't miss out more than 2...
  • if you want to get an A, .

Theme 3

💸 About Course Value

  • I felt that it was waste of my money.
  • please give me back my money and time.
  • he did not bring any CD for class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 4 old reviews, but the negative teaching and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL2513 reviews
ESL2441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values