AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lynn Knight

MATH194 · PRECALCULUS · CALCULUS · MATH182 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH135 · CALC192 · 265 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
25.51%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself through a heavy workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkFast lecturesExtra creditDisorganized teachingTough grading
  • Most reviews describe confusing, fast, disorganized teaching with and poor communication.
  • Grades can still be saved , and .
  • The course is high-effort and risky for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A is possible because of extra credit and dropped tests, but students , and stressful grading.

Both formats show A potential, but online reviews emphasize disorganization while and fast lectures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

27/100

The math content is made harder by , and limited feedback.

Both formats are challenging, with online students citing poor organization and in-person students citing speed, absences, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews describe mandatory , and penalties for missing class.

Online reviews explicitly mention mandatory attendance or same-day participation, while and in-class points.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking her because the , and stressful despite grade-saving .

, though a minority of strong math students in both formats recommend her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and dropped exams help, but as harsh, arbitrary, slow, or lacking partial credit.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints appear in both formats, while and as relief.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly describe excessive homework, accelerated pacing, long lectures, and time-consuming problem sets.

Format shift

Both formats are workload-heavy, with online summer classes and .

Teaching experience

Poor

31/100

Students frequently describe lectures as , and unsupported, with some reports of absences and poor communication.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on Canvas, Zoom, and email issues, while , and unclear explanations.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from homework, quizzes, participation, exams, practice tests, and .

Format shift

and exams, though many students still perceive the class as test-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with repeated complaints about confusing , and fast pacing.

Main concern

The workload and unclear instruction can make grades stressful even when helps.

What students said

“She teaches extremely quickly - to the or writing.”
MATH193
“Easy A if you put in the work”
MATH194

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing fast lectures, poor Canvas , and some .

Main concern

Students may struggle without strong self-teaching skills and tolerance for disorganization.

What students said

“ way too fast and was hard to keep up.”
MATH194
“ .”
MATH192

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often difficult but sometimes similar to practice work, with and .

Practice-Test SimilarityExtra CreditDropped ExamSome In-Person TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

49/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention exams, finals, quizzes, practice-test similarity, dropped exams, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

ExamsFinalQuizzesDropped ExamTake-Home Quiz
“There were 3 exams + 1 take-home and they were all straightforward and similar to the practice tests.”
MATH193
“ . Lots of EC.”
MATH194

Online

Online reviews mention tests, cameras, and , but do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or strict proctoring rules.

TestsCameras On MentionedIn-Person Tests For Online CourseNo Clear Lockdown Browser Evidence
“Online course, 4 in-person tests, and she never showed up.”
MATH194
“Professor Knight had about 3 hour lectures 4 days a week, cameras on, and lots of homework.”
MATH192

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself through a heavy workload.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format-specific organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

31/100

“She teaches extremely quickly - to the or writing.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“The homework takes at least 5-7 hours every day to complete.”

⚖️ Grade Survival

43/100

“She gives a lot of in the form of bonus review and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are super fast and doesn't come half of the semester.
  • .
  • She is a great professor, she is a gigachad though and moves through things at a fast pace with a lot of efficiency.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The , and right answers do not matter if her method isnt used.
  • Easy A if you put in the work
  • Lots of given out on tests.

Theme 3

💻 About Organization & Communication

  • Doesn't . .
  • , so you have no idea what your grade looks like until the last week.
  • First WEEK of class, she didn't bother to show.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

265

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across online and overall signal highly credible.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 527
3 out of 529
2 out of 547
1 out of 5112

Course coverage

MATH19418 reviews
MATH1939 reviews
MATH1927 reviews
CALCULUS5 reviews
1823 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1353 reviews
CALC1922 reviews
MATH1822 reviews
PRECALCULUS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 5 · A 17

B range

8

B 7 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 2