AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catherine Stitt

MATH121 · MATH191 · MATH192 · 108 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.37%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you want a strong math foundation and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear math teacherHeavy homeworkStrict exam gradingTest-heavy structureCaring but demanding
  • Students and strong math foundation.
  • The , and exams dominating the grade.
  • and can handle a demanding pace.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and using her exact methods.

Online and in-person reviews both describe hard work, with online comments adding strict deadlines and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Precalculus and calculus content is taught thoroughly but often feels fast, memorization-heavy, and demanding.

Online sections can feel more self-directed, while in-person sections provide clearer lectures but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but participation and staying engaged clearly matter.

, while online reviews focus more on workload and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

, but others warn against the workload and .

, while online reviews are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often describe small deductions, required methods, and .

Format shift

, but in-person reviews mention method-based deductions most often.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Homework is repeatedly described as frequent, time-consuming, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy homework, with online students describing long nightly workloads and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and caring, though some students find her old-school structure and technology use frustrating.

Format shift

, while online reviews range from excellent videos to lack of real guidance.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

, and finals, with homework often serving more as preparation than grade weight.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with several reviews citing four or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews more often praise her clear lectures and caring support, but and .

Main concern

and following her exact methods.

What students said

“ and clear.”
MATH191
“She is a professor who will not give A's unless you follow exactly the way she thinks.”
MATH191

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with strong lecture videos and support offset by heavy homework, limited guidance in some sections, and .

Main concern

Online students may need to manage a large workload and learn independently between videos, emails, and office hours.

What students said

“Late work isn't accepted, and the amount of .”
MATH192
“The most thorough lecture videos I have ever encountered in an online environment.”
191

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are often described as strict, memorization-heavy, and picky about methods.

Test HeavyStrict GradingClosed Notes EvidenceMethod-Based Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support closed-book or no-note exams in some sections and .

Closed Book EvidenceNo Notes EvidenceExam HeavyWeekly Quizzes
“No notes at all, even for the final.”
MATH191
“And .”
MATH191

Online

and at least one camera requirement, but they do not consistently prove open-book or Lockdown Browser use.

Test HeavyCamera Hands VisibleClosed Notes EvidenceStrict Grading
“you can't really cheat because your camera has to .”
MATH191
“This class is 85% exam based, our of 4 exams.”
MATH191

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a solid Pre-Calculus foundation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and easy to follow along with.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a professor who will not give A's unless you follow exactly the way she thinks.”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“Homework took 15+ hours a day.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , if you want to learn math properly, she is the professor to go to.
  • and clear.
  • The most thorough lecture videos I have ever encountered in an online environment.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's not easy to get the A.
  • if you are learning, but very very challenging.
  • She makes it really really hard to get a A and requires you memorize EVERYTHING.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Always open to help. !
  • She is one of the kindest souls I've ever met.
  • Very helpful and supportive, but you will need to study a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

108

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years show consistent patterns in teaching clarity, workload, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 553
4 out of 520
3 out of 510
2 out of 510
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH19132 reviews
1918 reviews
MATH1928 reviews
MATH1212 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

18

B+ 7 · B 11

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2