AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zahra Asghary

MATH121 · MATH004 · MATH142 · MATH191 · MATH85 · MATH120 · MATH181 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH011 · MATH182 · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.81%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a caring professor and will attend, participate, and use office hours despite uneven lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorHeavy homeworkParticipation mattersInconsistent lecturesExtra credit
  • Students strongly praise her care, office-hour help, and willingness to support students who participate.
  • Critics say lectures can be unclear, tangent-heavy, disorganized, or require self-teaching.
  • Grades can be manageable , and , but the workload is often heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

A grades are common, but students usually connect them to attendance, participation, homework, office hours, and rather than effortless grading.

In-person evidence shows more support and grade boosts, while and heavier self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The math content can be manageable with help, but unclear lectures, self-teaching, and .

Online sections seem more self-taught, while but also more participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple reviews say showing up and participating matter, and .

Attendance expectations are clearest in in-person reviews, while online reviews also mention attending class for .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend her when they value support and care, but not .

In-person recommendations are stronger among students who use office hours, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, participation boosts, and support can help grades, but some students report tough or .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention more grade boosts and relationship-based support, while .

Workload

Heavy

31/100

as a lot, time-consuming, or requiring substantial work outside class.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy homework, with in-person reviews mentioning group work and participation on top of assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Her care and office-hour help are strong, but lecture clarity and organization are inconsistent across reviews.

Format shift

and strongest criticism, while online reviews are limited and polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to involve , and rather than only exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention participation, group work, and exams more often, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews emphasize her kindness and support, but also frequent complaints about , and participation pressure.

Main concern

Students need to show up, participate, and ask for help to benefit from the class.

What students said

“she would stay in office hours for 2+ hours with me until I understood.”
MATH142
“I practically had to !!”
MATH193

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with some students calling her inspirational and , and .

Main concern

Online and limited clarity without the same in-person support.

What students said

“you have to self teach cause you’re relying on videos to do hw”
MATH191
“Absolutely one of the greatest professor's I have ever had.”
MATH191

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard to moderately friendly tests, with study guides, notecards in one class, and participation boosts, but some and .

Study Guide EvidenceNotecard Allowed EvidenceParticipation Extra CreditSome Hard Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

section, and some exams that are hard but manageable with preparation.

Notecard AllowedStudy Guide Similar To ExamParticipation Extra CreditHard Tests
“ !”
MATH142
“her "study guide" normally has most of the .”
MATH142

Online

Online reviews mention tests and but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

Test Heavy EvidenceTough Grading Evidence
“She gives out a lot of homework and you have to self teach cause you’re relying on videos to do hw”
MATH191
“ , so make sure to show all the work you possibly .”
MATH193

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Asghary is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

78/100

“she would stay in office hours for 2+ hours with me until I understood.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Consistency

60/100

“Spends too much time trying to be inspirational when she could be teaching”

📚 Workload Reality

31/100

“Be prepared, because there is a lot of homework.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She truly cares about you as a student and your success.
  • she made learning easier and the class more enjoyable.
  • She is the person who inspires you to love math.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • Lectures only teach the basic concepts of each chapter, and you are left on your own
  • Her lectures could be simplified but she spends most of the time rambling
  • and .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • and she gives you 7 chances for each problem to get 100%
  • you too).
  • if you cant commit alot of time to a class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several math courses and formats provide rich but polarized evidence about support, workload, and lecture clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 511
3 out of 56
2 out of 512
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH14213 reviews
MATH19310 reviews
MATH1919 reviews
MATH1214 reviews
MATH1814 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH0113 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1922 reviews
MATH0041 review
MATH1821 review
MATH851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 7 · A 15 · A- 6

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 8

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2