AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Munlok Lum

MATH121 · MATH191 · MATH294 · MATH195 · CALCULUS193 · MATH292 · MATH192 · TRIGONOMETRY · MATH183 · MATH193 · MATH135 · 97 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
40.85%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can learn , and use his examples to prepare for predictable tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderHeavy HomeworkSelf-Teaching NeededTest HeavyStraightforward Exams
  • Students are deeply split, but many negative reviews describe , a thick accent, and .
  • because it is long, repetitive, and often graded harshly from only a few selected problems.
  • Some students still earn A grades because exams and quizzes often resemble lecture examples or if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

47/100

A grades are possible because tests often mirror examples, but and and stressful.

Both formats mention predictable tests, but online reviews more often describe high-stakes exams and in-person reviews .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is made harder , and frequent need for self-teaching.

Online reviews blame recorded or vague videos, while and accent issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance or physical presence is often important because reviews , and lecture-based test preparation.

, while online reviews focus more on watching videos and keeping up with work.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Many students advise against him because of , and harsh grading despite some predictable exams.

Both formats are mixed, but online reviews are especially negative about teaching delivery and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say he grades harshly, chooses only a , and deducts for small details.

Format shift

especially focused on homework problem selection.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

as long, repetitive, brutal, and time-consuming across calculus and higher math courses.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy homework, with online summer or accelerated classes sounding especially compressed.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students like his straightforward example style, but , and require self-teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize recorded videos and , while and classroom explanations.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades often rely heavily on quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention 40 percent midterms and finals, while , and selected homework grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some like his direct example-based style, but , and attendance constraints.

Main concern

Students may struggle with lecture clarity and .

What students said

“If you attend every lecture, this class will be an easy A.”
MATH294
“ , but he only grades a few problems and based on correctness.”
MATH195
“Be prepared to teach yourself, if you're not already too burnt out to try.”
MATH135

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and test-heavy grading, with a few students praising straightforward structure.

Main concern

Online students often need to self-teach while and .

What students said

“His teaching style is odd, he doesn't follow the DVC-wide rules for and assigns a ludicrous amount of homework”
MATH193
“20% hw, and 40% each for the midterms and the .”
MATH292
“ !”
MATH183

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often predictable from examples or homework, but , and limited partial credit keep the .

Test HeavyPredictable QuestionsHigh-Stakes FinalNo Partial CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

49/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

examples, and a heavily weighted final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesExample-Based TestsHigh-Stakes FinalNo Clear Closed-Book Evidence
“ as the example questions he solves with us in class.”
MATH294
“ .”
TRIGONOMETRY
“ lecture prior, and worth 30%.”
MATH292

Online

Online reviews mention recorded lectures, quizzes, midterms, and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or strict proctoring.

High-Stakes MidtermsHigh-Stakes FinalRecorded VideosNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“20% hw, and 40% each for the midterms and the .”
MATH292
“10 hws worth 20%, 4 quizzes 40%, final exam 40%.”
MATH193
“Instructor only had recorded videos and not live lectures, but had office hours.”
MATH193

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fairly easy A, but overall not good. Lecture is ho-hum with very thick accent. , but he only grades a few problems and based on correctness.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exam predictability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself, if you're not already too burnt out to try.”

⚖️

18/100

“He is an .”

📚 Workload

16/100

“Expect 8+ hours of HW.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are pretty but as the example questions he solves with us in class.
  • You're better off learning off the textbook yourself.
  • I learn well by seeing examples and he provided lots of examples for all the things he would teach.

Theme 2

📈

  • If you attend every lecture, this class will be an easy A.
  • He will not give you ANY
  • .

Theme 3

📚

  • , but he only grades a few problems and based on correctness.
  • The of homework problems he assigns
  • His HW is very repetitive and tedious.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

97

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many courses and both formats provide strong evidence, with , and predictable exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 519
3 out of 58
2 out of 514
1 out of 528

Course coverage

MATH19313 reviews
MATH1929 reviews
MATH1837 reviews
MATH2927 reviews
MATH1353 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1953 reviews
MATH1912 reviews
MATH2942 reviews
2941 review
CALCULUS1931 review
MATH1211 review
TRIGONOMETRY1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 10

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 1