AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kemi Aladegbami

COMSC110 · COMPSC165 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid Kemi Aladegbami unless you already know programming and and assignments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPowerPoint-heavy lecturesTough gradingNot beginner friendlySelf-teaching requiredHard exams and quizzes
  • Most recent reviews strongly warn beginners away because .
  • Students , and exams as difficult or overly specific.
  • A few older or positive reviews say the class can be manageable for students with prior coding experience who study hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments say high grades require , and exact compliance with .

Online reviews are harsher about earning grades, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Intro programming is described as hard for beginners because lectures are slide-heavy and students often need to learn material independently.

Both formats show difficulty, with online reviews especially warning students without prior coding experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews , though students emphasize keeping up with lectures, readings, labs, quizzes, and assignments.

Neither format clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because they report unclear teaching, rude , and poor beginner support.

Online and , though a few older in-person reviews are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many comments describe tough, specific grading and easy grades in older reviews.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are more mixed because older reviews mention easy grading and curves.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report difficult homework, lots of reading, weekly assignments, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier self-teaching pressure, while and limited support.

Teaching experience

Poor

23/100

The dominant complaint is that lectures are mostly PowerPoint reading with little coding demonstration and weak help for confused students.

Format shift

Both formats share the same teaching concern, with online reviews giving more detailed recent criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and programming work rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, assignments, and exams, while , and computer-based tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean negative, with older praise for easy grading outweighed by repeated complaints about poor support and slide-based teaching.

Main concern

Students without prior programming experience report feeling unsupported and discouraged.

What students said

“You should not take this class (Compsci - 165) if you are an inexperienced programmer.”
COMPSC165
“Her lectures are ONLY the . .”
COMSC110
“Grades super easy.”
COMSC110

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with students , and weak help for beginners.

Main concern

Beginners may struggle because students report little live coding, limited support, and .

What students said

“If you are new to coding with no ”
COMSC110
“She only reads PPT and haven’t type a single code in entire semester.”
COMSC110
“Prepare to work hard if grade.”
COMSC110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Hard quizzesHard examsTest heavyComputer-based coding tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and computer-based coding tests but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Hard finalComputer-based coding testsTest heavy
“Her lectures are ONLY the . .”
COMSC110
“Even during the .”
COMSC110

Online

Online reviews describe hard quizzes and exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Hard quizzesHard examsTest heavy
“The quizzes and the ”
COMSC110
“Very hard, like what the other students said is all true, from the lectures, grades, questions, and exams.”
COMSC110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are new to coding with no ”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and beginner support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

23/100

“She only reads PPT and haven’t type a single code in entire semester.”

⚖️

24/100

“Very specific grader, marks off everything that isn't exactly following guidelines”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“AVOID”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Only thing
  • Lecture is 3 hours of you what to do and occasionally showing screenshots of examples.
  • She reads word for word from a Powerpoint

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Prepare to work hard if grade.
  • The and the tests especially were difficult as someone who had just started learning C++.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Beginner Fit

  • You should not take this class (Compsci - 165) if you are an inexperienced programmer.
  • The only reason I could handle her class is because of
  • If you're a new student who is entering into programming career, DO NOT THIS CLASS WITH THIS TEACHER.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 19 reviews across both formats repeatedly cite the same issues, though some older positive reviews create mixed evidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

COMSC11016 reviews
COMPSC1652 reviews
1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1