AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jenny Freidenreich

MATH121 · MATH125 · MATH120 · MATH192 · MATH193 · CALC192 · 145 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
56.82%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are strong in , and are ready to work consistently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy homeworkPolarizing teachingStrict examsHelpful if prepared
  • Student opinion is sharply split, with strong praise for and strong criticism of and rudeness.
  • The , and serious exam preparation.
  • Getting an A is possible, but many students describe the workload and grading as stressful or unforgiving.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible for and study hard, but , and heavy work make it costly.

Both formats require real effort, with online reviews adding more self-teaching risk and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content is difficult, fast, and often demands a strong foundation before students can keep up.

and , while online reviews say the structure can be easy to follow but still demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation help, but the , and deadlines rather than attendance alone.

In-person reviews mention participation and group work more, while online , and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

She is recommended by students who value structure and rigorous math learning, but and communication style.

Both formats are split, with online reviews slightly more dependent on self-teaching comfort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students describe grading as harsh, nitpicky, inconsistent, or low on partial credit, even when they understand the material.

Format shift

, but recent in-person MATH 192 and 193 reviews are especially negative.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently report lots of homework, projects, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews cite weekly homework and , while , and stressful quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her lectures can be clear and helpful, but the experience is dragged down by repeated , and stress.

Format shift

In-person reviews are more polarized, while online reviews depend heavily on whether students can learn from modules and outside resources.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment leans toward quizzes, exams, cumulative tests, and and discussions depending on the course.

Format shift

Online sections often include WebAssign, discussions, and in-person exams; , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some excellent teaching praise but , and rude communication.

Main concern

Strict grading and much more stressful.

What students said

“ .”
MATH193
“She has the ”
CALC192
“Stressful class, lectures were alright but not thorough enough to prepare you for ”
MATH-192

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some praising structure and responsiveness while , and .

Main concern

Online students may need to self-teach through videos, textbook work, WebAssign, and .

What students said

“Tests + discussions + 2-4 homework assignments every week and in .”
MATH121
“Her online course is very developed, well structured, and easy to follow.”
MATH121
“I spent hours and , and and too long to finish.”
MATH121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because many reviews , and exams that feel harder than preparation materials.

Difficult ExamsHarsh GradingLimited Partial CreditIn-Person ExamsCheat Sheets In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes as difficult, strict, or exam-like, though some sections allow cheat sheets or notecards.

Difficult ExamsQuiz ExamsCheat Sheets In Some SectionsHarsh Grading
“She rarely gives partial credit”
MATH-192
“allows cheat sheets in exams”
MATH121
“her "quizzes". ”
CALC192

Online

Online reviews , and tests that can be too long, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

In-Person ExamsMonthly ExamsCumulative ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“in ”
MATH121
“ but are cumulative!”
MATH121
“ and too long to finish”
MATH121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Calc 2 is a difficult subject, but Professor Freidenreich made it easy to understand. She is not an , but if you do the homework and study her lecture notes you are gonna do very well in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Her lectures are great, and .”

⚖️

20/100

“ ; I knew students that clearly knew the content well but were getting C's or .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“IF put your life on pause.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has the understandable pieces then bridging them together.
  • She is always well-prepared and and in an .
  • She didn't lecture, instead she linked to youtube videos of math tutors or gave the instruction read the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She rarely gives partial credit
  • She doesn't give you an A if you don't deserve it.

Theme 3

🧮 About Workload And Exams

  • She gives a lot of homework and there is also a project, her class requires time and effort.
  • Tests + discussions + 2-4 homework assignments every week and in .
  • and difficult for no reason.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

145

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews with detailed, recent, and repeated evidence of both strong teaching praise and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 522
3 out of 516
2 out of 526
1 out of 528

Course coverage

MATH12120 reviews
MATH1939 reviews
MATH-1928 reviews
CALC1926 reviews
1922 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1252 reviews
MATH-1931 review
MATH1201 review
MATH1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 6 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

13

B+ 4 · B 7 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3