AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lindsey Lang

MATH121 · CALC192 · MATH191 · STATC1000E · MATH120 · MATH090 · MATH192 · MATH135 · MATH182 · 135 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
70.21%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want to truly learn math and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent explanationsMastery gradingHigh workloadTest heavyCaring but demanding
  • Many students call Lang an excellent, caring math teacher who helps them deeply understand the material.
  • Her and revisions, but it is stressful for students who struggle with exams.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because some students felt unsupported or forced to teach themselves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A high , and help, but students repeatedly say it requires hard study and .

, while online reviews include stronger warnings about no , no curve, and heavy memorization.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is demanding, especially calculus and .

Both formats describe challenging content, with online students .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance is useful for support and participation, but comments do not prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize class time and help, while online reviews mention videos, notes, and occasional Zoom or no-Zoom structures.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Many students strongly recommend her for learning, but the grade-first students.

, while online recommendations are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Mastery grading offers revisions and , but exams can dominate grades and some courses have no curve, no , or no retakes.

Format shift

, while online MATH182 and MATH135 reviews include harsher grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and around 10 hours a week for difficult courses.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online reviews adding self-teaching pressure and .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students praise her clarity, patience, humor, and caring support, but a sizable minority report poor online teaching or .

Format shift

, while online teaching is more inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Many reviews say grades depend heavily on exams, quizzes, mastery tests, finals, and .

Format shift

In-person calculus , while online reviews also mention exams and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students often praise her clarity, patience, and caring style, but many warn that and .

Main concern

The and or weak foundations.

What students said

“You have to work for a good grade, but .”
MATH192
“ .”
MATH192
“She was always willing to help me - during class, in office hours, and when I emailed her questions.”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

several praise clear videos, notes, and , while others say the workload is heavy and .

Main concern

Online students may need to learn independently and handle .

What students said

“Online recorded lectures and the accompanying notes were great and ideal for reviewing course content.”
MATH192
“She doesn't teach anything only posts videos from Knewton.”
MATH135
“ .”
MATH182

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies by course because some reviews praise open notes or retakes while others , and .

Open Note TestsNo Notecards on ExamsMastery RetakesTake-Home Final PortionExam-Heavy Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exam evidence shows open-note tests in statistics, no cheat sheets in some calculus reviews, and a .

Open Note TestsNo Cheat SheetsMastery RetakesExam-Heavy Grading
“ and .”
STAT-C1000E
“Very caring and funny prof but does not allow any cheat sheets on the exams”
MATH192
“ ”
MATH192

Online

notecards, no retakes in one course, reattempts in another, and a take-home final portion in MATH135.

No Notecards on ExamsNo Exam RetakeMastery ReattemptsTake-Home Final Portion
“she doesn't allow ”
MATH182
“you can reattempt 20 of them.”
MATH192
“ .”
MATH135

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to work for a good grade, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She was always willing to help me - during class, in office hours, and when I emailed her questions.”

⚖️

50/100

“She grades on .”

📚 Workload Demand

28/100

“Prepare to work your butt off for this course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very knowledgeable, and she's also super good at explaining difficult math stuff in easy to understand ways.
  • Lindsey helped me with every question I had and always did it smiling and patient.
  • and stops to answer all our questions and listens to us.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She has high standards and you have to work hard but you'll learn and understand more than ever before.
  • .
  • derivita and genuinely taught well, greatest math instructor ever

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • she has notes and videos that she created for every single topic.
  • If you're not mathematically inclined - have fun teaching yourself the material.
  • Math is really a pain to learn online. Lindsey's .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

135

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 detailed reviews from 2020 to 2026 with broad course coverage and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 597
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 518

Course coverage

MATH19224 reviews
MATH1358 reviews
MATH1216 reviews
CALC1925 reviews
MATH1822 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1912 reviews
MATH0901 review
MATH1201 review
STAT-C1000E1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 3 · A 14

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 8

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

14

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2