AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anna Somayeh Sohi

MATH121 · MATH142 · MATH1420044 · MATH191 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH119 · STATISTIC142 · MATH135 · MATH182 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
64.94%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend, practice consistently, and use support, but if you need a flexible or low-workload math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but strictLecture heavyLots of homeworkTest heavyExtra credit
  • many recent , while many online students report self-teaching and weak communication.
  • Grades can be good with , and , but the workload and deadlines are often heavy.
  • Exams are central to many courses, with strict make-up policies in some online reviews and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

A strong grade is realistic with , and , but it usually takes consistent effort.

In-person reviews more often describe a fair effort-to-grade path, while online reviews are more divided and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is manageable when she teaches clearly, but calculus, statistics, pace, and .

In-person students more often say lectures make hard math manageable, while online students more often report fast pace and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Many comments , and class-time exams matter a lot.

Both formats show low flexibility, with online and in-person reviews stressing attendance and punctuality.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

and caring support, but many online and older reviews strongly warn against her.

evidence, which is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, note cards, and final replacement help, but , and test-heavy grading reduce leniency.

Format shift

, while online reviews include more harsh-grading and no-make-up complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent homework, , and projects make the workload heavy.

Format shift

Both online and more likely to call it overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and caring teaching, but online reviews include repeated complaints about self-teaching and poor communication.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is mixed to negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Many , and sometimes a project, with homework used for practice and grade support.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams heavily, though and note cards.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, emphasizing caring lectures, group work, note cards, , and better support despite homework and .

Main concern

, and test preparation are important for doing well.

What students said

“She breaks down every problem, so if you have any questions, she will happily answer them.”
MATH192
“Want to pass? Show up to every class, do the !”
MATH135
“There are 3 exams, 1 final & 1 project. A LOT of homework but you work on them in class with groups.”
STATISTIC142

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with some students praising and manageable work while others report , and strict exam rules.

Main concern

Online students may need to teach themselves and manage strict deadlines or exams.

What students said

“ unless you want to teach yourself everything”
MATH-182
“ , so nothing surprising or difficult.”
MATH142
“ .”
MATH135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and replacement policies in some sections but strict make-up rules and harsh grading in others.

Multiple ExamsFinal Replaces Lowest ExamNote Cards AllowedStrict Make-Up PolicyOnline Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final that can replace the lowest exam, quizzes, and test-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Note Cards AllowedMultiple ExamsFinal Replaces Lowest ExamGroup QuizzesTest Heavy
“There are 3 exams, 1 final & 1 project.”
STATISTIC142
“gives one sided note(two for final)”
MATH193
“ if you do better on it.”
MATH135

Online

Online reviews mention multiple online exams, , and proctoring only when explicitly stated as exam proctoring.

Online ExamsOnline QuizzesStrict Make-Up PolicyCumulative FinalExam Proctoring Mentioned
“She allows no make-up exams no matter what, even medical emergencies, family matters, no exceptions.”
MATH-182
“4 online Exams plus final, 4 online quizes, ihave to take it during class hrs, she is a ”
MATH191
“the class only meet when there was an .”
MATH142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, engage, ask questions, and study the concepts at home you will do great in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ , and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“A LOT of homework but you work on them in class with groups.”

⚖️

58/100

“She gives a lot of opportunities and do them it makes that much of the difference.”

👍 Recommendation Split

67/100

“ unless you want to teach yourself everything”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She breaks down every problem, so if you have any questions, she will happily answer them.
  • , and .
  • Had to teach yourself basically everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not difficult to do well in this class if you show up and work hard.
  • A LOT of homework but you work on them in class with groups.
  • She gives a lot of opportunities and do them it makes that much of the difference.

Theme 3

📝

  • She allows no make-up exams no matter what, even medical emergencies, family matters, no exceptions.
  • Attendance is mandatory because .
  • gives one sided note(two for final)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years, many courses, and both formats provide rich and consistent evidence of strengths and risks.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 58
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH14217 reviews
MATH1929 reviews
MATH1358 reviews
MATH-1824 reviews
MATH1914 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1933 reviews
STATISTIC1422 reviews
MATH1191 review
MATH1211 review
MATH14200441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 6 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

12

B+ 1 · B 10 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3