AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Concetta Gomez

MATH194 · MATH191 · MATH120 · MATH192 · MATH193 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can and heavy workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAvoid StronglyTough GraderSelf-Taught MathHeavy HomeworkStrict Exams
  • Most reviews are strongly negative, citing , and weak classroom support.
  • Students repeatedly describe the course as , and exam-heavy.
  • A few students praise office hours and detailed lectures, but they are outweighed by many severe warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A high grade is possible for strong students, but most comments , and little partial credit.

Online evidence is limited and mixed, while requires major self-teaching and exam performance.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content is already difficult and becomes harder because lectures are fast, confusing, disorganized, or and exams.

Both formats describe confusion and heavy math work, with exams and weak instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews suggest attendance , and skipping class can hurt performance.

In-person reviews provide the attendance evidence, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students warn against taking her because they feel unsupported, harshly graded, and .

, while online reviews include one positive office-hours note but still show serious risk.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly report , and low grades on proofs or assignments.

Format shift

, while online reviews also include tough-grader tags but less detailed grading evidence.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of homework, weekly quizzes, difficult exams, WebAssign, proofs, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework, with , and difficult proofs.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe her as disorganized, unclear, unhelpful, strict, and .

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed but mostly negative, while quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades appear heavily tied to quizzes, exams, finals, proofs, and protect the grade.

Format shift

, and test-heavy grading, while online reviews mention homework and discussions more generally.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, describing poor , and chaotic class time.

Main concern

Students while and little partial credit.

What students said

“IF YOU CANNOT TEACH YOURSELF .”
MATH192
“No partial credit for .”
MATH194

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but mostly risky, with one strong office-hours praise and two severe complaints about confusion, workload, and professionalism.

Main concern

Online students may need to and .

What students said

“Probably the .”
MATH192
“she is very passionate in helping students.”
MATH194

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report difficult exams, weekly quizzes, no partial credit, and strict classroom rules.

Difficult ExamsNo Partial CreditWeekly QuizzesNo Electronics In ClassTest-Heavy Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

14/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, weekly quizzes, no partial credit, and no electronics in class.

Difficult ExamsNo Partial CreditWeekly QuizzesNo Electronics In Class
“No partial credit for .”
MATH194
“No electronics in class.”
MATH194

Online

and weekly discussion boards, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenWeekly Discussion BoardsHeavy Homework
“There is .”
MATH192
“A lots of hw.”
MATH192

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IF YOU CANNOT TEACH YOURSELF .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ and probably couldn't teach 3rd grade math if her life depended on it.”

⚖️

12/100

“No partial credit for .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

16/100

“ . WARNING. GET OUT NOW”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not know the content of what she teaches
  • and nothing is taught
  • It's more self taught than learning from her.

Theme 2

🧮 About Exams And Grades

  • and .
  • No partial credit for .
  • too much quizs and exams

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • A lots of hw.
  • She assigns a lot of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 24 reviews span many years and courses, and the dominant negative themes are repeated often despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH19210 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH1934 reviews
MATH1944 reviews
MATH1911 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 5