AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kwai Chan

MATH121 · MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH192 · MATH135 · MATH182 · MATH075 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
81.63%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

She is a good choice for students who want patient math support and grade cushions, but not for students who need perfectly polished lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBeginner FriendlyLots of PracticeExtra CreditRetakes and DropsMixed Lecture Clarity
  • Most students describe her as kind, supportive, and especially helpful for students who need practice in math.
  • Grades are often helped by retakes, dropped scores, , completion-based work, and fair tests.
  • A meaningful minority report , fast pacing, disorganization, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very attainable , and fair tests, but students still need consistent practice.

In-person reviews more often describe grade cushions and open-note exams, while online reviews are and heavy weekly testing.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content is often made approachable with examples and practice, but pacing, homework volume, and .

, while online reviews show more confusion and self-teaching risk.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance sometimes counts through participation, worksheets, or classwork, though a few students report missing class without major issues.

Online reviews mention participation or , while in-person reviews vary because worksheets are due each lecture.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and support, but some strongly warn against her because of confusing teaching.

negative reviews are more severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

She often drops low scores, offers retakes, accepts late work with deductions, gives , and .

Format shift

Both formats show lenient grade structures, with , and partial credit.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is steady and sometimes heavy, with , and projects, though many tasks are manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly exams or multiple assignments, while but useful practice.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is widely described as kind, helpful, and example-driven, but her lectures .

Format shift

, while online reviews include sharper complaints about mistakes and miscommunication.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment usually combines homework, classwork, , and dropped scores.

Format shift

Both formats use mixed assessments, with online reviews emphasizing quizzes and exams and in-person reviews adding classwork and worksheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing kindness, many examples, fair grading, , retakes, and strong support for beginners.

Main concern

Some students find her soft-spoken, fast-paced, disorganized, or .

What students said

“I would absolutely recommend her 100% to beginners.”
MATH182
“I had to , and I got tutoring outside of class”
MATH121
“ !”
142

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, ranging from very easy and because of miscommunication, mistakes, workload, and .

Main concern

Online students may need to rely on YouTube videos, tutoring, or .

What students said

“ off and we can ask her questions.”
MATH142
“I needed to pay for an educated tutor to survive in this class.”
MATH142
“You can get over a 100% at the end of the semester if you just do the work.”
MATH142

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is generally student-friendly because reviews mention , and fair tests, though online exams can still be frequent or hard.

Open-Note ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedRetakesDropped ScoresZoom Tests With Cameras Off

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews report open-note , and dropped scores, with no clear evidence of strict proctoring.

Open-Note ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedRetakesDropped Lowest ScoresFair Tests
“ !”
142
“She allowed a , and final.”
MATH194
“ and and test scores.”
MATH121

Online

and Zoom tests with cameras off in another, but they do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser or strict proctoring.

In-Person Exams For Online ClassZoom Tests With Cameras OffWeekly Quizzes And Exams
“4 exams (in person) which aren't difficult.”
MATH135
“ off and we can ask her questions.”
MATH142
“ .”
MATH142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would absolutely recommend her 100% to beginners.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching , and clarity concerns; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She uses many examples to ensure the content is understandable and provides detailed notes and classwork”

📈 Grade Support

82/100

“ and and test scores.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

52/100

“I had to , and I got tutoring outside of class”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She assigns a lot of , and provides plenty of practice opportunities.
  • Gives a lot of examples and .
  • Her lectures are easy to follow and understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An A is attainable if you attend every lecture and do all the classworks.
  • Online hw every weekend but you can retry each question to get 100%.
  • You really have to put in effort.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Confusion

  • Her lectures, and .
  • She's super sweet but she goes way too fast.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews cover many years, math courses, formats, and outcomes, giving strong evidence despite mixed experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 512
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH14231 reviews
MATH1216 reviews
MATH1824 reviews
MATH1943 reviews
1422 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1352 reviews
MATH0751 review
MATH1921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 3 · A 22 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 7

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1