AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Concha Gomez

MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH120 · MA192 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH135 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
27.66%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are already strong in , and are prepared to learn independently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHeavy HomeworkCondescending ToneSelf-Teaching RiskTest Heavy
  • Most students warn that , and workload can be heavy.
  • Some strong math students praise her standards and say hard work can pay off.
  • The dominant concern is the classroom experience, with many reviews describing her as rude, condescending, or unsupportive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible for disciplined or already strong students, but , and .

Online reviews make the A feel harder because of self-learning, while effort and tolerance for strict grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is already demanding, and , and support make it harder.

Both formats are challenging, with online reviews emphasizing self-teaching and and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews repeatedly stress showing up, paying attention, and strict class expectations, with .

and participation expectations, while online evidence focuses on deadlines and self-management.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and a condescending tone.

Both formats lean negative, though a small group of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Many students report , and low flexibility for mistakes or emergencies.

Format shift

providing the most detailed examples.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and demanding test preparation.

Format shift

Online and students especially noting long WebAssign-style assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

A minority praise her knowledge, but , and a condescending classroom tone.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize self-teaching, while and unclear explanations.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are often driven by quizzes, tests, exams, and as important and strict.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, but most negative comments , and weak explanations.

Main concern

Students must handle strict policies, lots of homework, and limited patience with questions.

What students said

“ .”
MATH192
“Some assignments will take 10+ hours”
MA192
“She is very rude and condescending”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing , and little support.

Main concern

Students say online sections require heavy self-learning with and poor preparation for tests.

What students said

“Expects you to basically learn on your own and read the textbooks on your own.”
MATH194
“Most of the class is self-learning.”
MATH192
“Has high expectations, but can't teach or .”
MATH192

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-risk because students report , and specific format requirements.

Test HeavyStrict GradingLittle Partial CreditNo Note Cards In Some SectionsNo Graphing Calculators In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, no note cards in some sections, and no graphing calculators in one review, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsRare Partial CreditNo Note Cards In Some SectionsNo Graphing Calculators In Some Sections
“ , but !”
MATH192
“partial credit is rare when she grades”
MATH194
“no note cards”
MATH192

Online

Online reviews mention conceptual tests and test-heavy courses, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Conceptual TestsTest HeavyStrict Grading
“The and she does not prepare you well for it.”
MATH194
“Test heavy”
MATH194
“Test heavy”
MATH192

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Cannot teach or .”

⚖️

15/100

“You have to follow exactly her format when you doing test or you will received 0 or 1 point out of 10 even you get most part right.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Some assignments will take 10+ hours but you'll only have a couple days to do them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures the whole time and condescending to questions
  • students are told to figure things out on their own
  • Only uploads few short videos of the concepts and relies on other people's videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • No partial credit for .
  • Her tests and so it's very easy to fail.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • She is very rude and condescending
  • If you want your sanity by the end of the .
  • She comes off as very condescending.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 47 reviews across many years show a consistent negative pattern, despite a minority of positive experiences.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 58
1 out of 527

Course coverage

MATH19214 reviews
MATH12010 reviews
MATH1948 reviews
MA1926 reviews
Math-1353 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH1423 reviews
MATH1933 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

4

C 2 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 4