AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Ken Vonberg

CNT103 · CNT117 · CITRIX · CNT151 · CNT150 · CNT104 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

exposure, but if you need structure, feedback, and reliable communication.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy ADisorganized courseHands-on industry knowledgePoor communicationLow structure
  • Students consistently describe the class as very easy to pass, often with few assignments and .
  • Teaching quality is split between strong industry knowledge and serious complaints about disorganization, rambling, and poor communication.
  • Online reviews emphasize easy grades with weak support, while older courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

The class is repeatedly described as an easy A with , and .

Both formats support easy grading, with online reviews and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Most students describe the work as simple and repetitive, though some technical hands-on topics can challenge beginners.

Online content appears easiest and most repetitive, while in-person hands-on courses may require more technical independence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews mention showing up and day-to-day lab work, but .

Online evidence does not show attendance rules, while and grading visibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

but criticize disorganization, communication, and low learning value.

Online reviews are less recommendable because of weak support, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Grades are often easy, based on few items, and sometimes not fully structured, making high grades common despite confusion.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews support lenient outcomes, though .

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and low difficulty.

Format shift

Online workload is especially light, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He has strong industry knowledge and hands-on value, but many students report , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for weak support, while learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment is mostly assignments, labs, day-to-day work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention a few assignments and , while , and occasional big exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and strong real-world knowledge, but also poor structure, vague grading, and rambling lectures.

Main concern

The main risk is disorganization and .

What students said

“Easy A.”
CNT104
“ and some never applied to final grade.”
CNT104
“90% of the course work is hands-on lab where you apply real world concepts that you learn in the lectures.”
CNT117

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews say the class is extremely easy with few assignments, but and weak on communication.

Main concern

Students may earn an A while learning little and getting minimal support.

What students said

“Had maybe 5 assignments total.”
CNT-103
“Extremely easy class.”
CNT-103
“ .”
CNT-103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam pressure is usually low, with and others using labs or a small number of exams.

No FinalFew AssignmentsTwo Big Exams In Some CoursesLabs Instead Of Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in one course, and lab-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Two Big ExamsLab-Heavy GradingNo Books Or Exams In Some Courses
“ .”
CNT117
“90% of the course work is hands-on lab where you apply real world concepts that you learn in the lectures.”
CNT117
“no books or .”
CNT117

Online

Online reviews explicitly support a and do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

No FinalFew Assignments
“Its very easy only 4 assignments and .”
CNT-103
“Had maybe 5 assignments total.”
CNT-103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's good for getting a good grade but not for learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and hands-on value. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy Grade

94/100

“Easy A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Ken is VERY knowledgable about everything Microsoft.”

🧩 Course Organization

35/100

“ and some never applied to final grade.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Extremely easy class.
  • Its very easy only 4 assignments and .
  • As long as you are able to turn in all the .

Theme 2

🧩 About Organization

  • and unorganized.
  • Everything is made on the and labs.
  • arbitrary and unstructured deadlines.

Theme 3

💻 About Real-World Learning

  • Knowledgeable guy with lots of experience.
  • Content is current and relevant.
  • All of Ken's classes are hands-on classes that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews give useful evidence across formats, but several are old and course experiences vary over time.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CNT1174 reviews
CNT-1033 reviews
CNT1043 reviews
CITRIX1 review
CNT1501 review
Show 1 more courses
CNT1511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values