AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Meetal Shah

MATH124 · MAT194 · MATH121 · MATH141 · MATH142 · MATH194 · MATH195 · MATH292 · MATH192 · MATH193 · MATH119 · STATC1000 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
48.1%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take him if you are self-organized and value , but avoid him if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtra credit heavySelf-study requiredFast lecturesMixed teaching qualityTest-focused
  • some praise his help, , and fair exam prep, while others say he rushes and .
  • , and makeup opportunities can make grades recoverable for organized students.
  • The biggest , and lectures that some students find fast, unclear, or condescending.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

, cheat sheets, and , but students still need consistent homework and self-study to earn an A.

Online reviews show stronger grade support, while and teaching fit.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

Some lower-level courses feel easy, but calculus and higher math reviews describe complex content, fast lectures, and .

Online students often say the structure is manageable, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Several reviews explicitly , though attending is still useful for practice.

In-person reviews provide the , while and exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

He works well for self-directed students who use and office hours, but many students warn that .

Online recommendation is stronger than in-person because online and flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and makeup exams often soften tough grading, though some reviews still call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews show especially strong grading supports, while .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Many students report lots of , and substantial outside study.

Format shift

, but online students describe it as .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising clarity and care while .

Format shift

Online reviews are more positive, while style.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Courses commonly rely on exams, quizzes, finals, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams, with online reviews giving clearer details about cheat sheets and corrections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for accessibility and but frequent complaints about rushed lectures and .

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may feel lost because lectures can move fast and require self-teaching.

What students said

“ .”
MATH119
“If everything at home because he speeds through each lesson.”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive about flexibility, , cheat sheets, and , though self-learning is still important.

Main concern

Online lectures can be and .

What students said

“ exam.”
MATH194
“Not a terrible professor but expect a lot of self-learning.”
MATH292

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be difficult, but , cheat sheets, corrections, and makeup options make the exam system relatively student-friendly.

Extra CreditCheat Sheet AllowedTest CorrectionsMakeup ExamsPractice Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

73/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention , and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Cumulative ExamsExtra Credit On ExamsMakeup ExamsCheat Sheets
“If you score below 70% on an raise your score up to 70%.”
Math-192
“He gives and allows cheat sheets for exams.”
MATH119

Online

Online reviews mention practice exams, , full-page cheat sheets, and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Practice ExamsExtra CreditFull Page Cheat SheetTest Corrections Up To 70%
“Allows a full page cheat sheet.”
MATH194
“He allows a full sheet of and test corrections up to 70%.”
math193

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you can't learn by yourself, or you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , lecture clarity, workload, exams, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

➕ Grade Support

72/100

“He offers lots of and help.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Consistency

55/100

“Constantly rushes lectures and doesn't spend time explaining, he just wants to get the chapters done fast as possible.”

🧮

73/100

“He allows a full page cheat sheet.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and caring during the class and office hours.
  • talks way too fast, calls out to the class for us to guess(when it hasn't been taught yet)
  • and straight to the point.

Theme 2

📚

  • Be prepared to do 4+ hours of .
  • Not a terrible professor but expect a lot of self-learning.
  • As long as you put in the work, this class is a breeze.

Theme 3

📈

  • There are a lot of opportunities.
  • Test corrections up to 70%.
  • , so study hard and be well prepared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset includes 50 reviews across many math courses and years, with consistent signals about , workload, and teaching-style polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH19410 reviews
MATH1217 reviews
MATH1247 reviews
MATH1426 reviews
MATH2926 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1193 reviews
math1933 reviews
Math-1922 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MAT1941 review
MATH1921 review
MATH1951 review
STAT-C10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 6 · B 5

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 2