AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cyrous Ahmadieh

MATH121 · MATH191L · MATH294 · MATH192 · MATH142L · MATH135 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can handle some self-teaching when lectures do not click.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy gradingMixed lecturesChill and approachableSelf-study neededOpen-note exams
  • Grades are often easy because , and straightforward exams help students pass.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising clear pacing and .
  • because the course may be grade-friendly even when lectures are weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is often easy because exams are straightforward, homework can outweigh , and .

Online reviews show easy pacing and helpful study guides, while , open notes, and generous partial credit.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course often feels manageable because exams and assignments are simple, but and harder math topics add challenge.

Online evidence suggests slow pacing, while and confusing lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

necessary in some lecture-heavy in-person classes.

Online reviews explicitly say attendance may not be required, while harder.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

and a chill style, but not for consistently strong teaching.

Online reviews are mostly positive but sparse, while and clear warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly mention easy exams, open notes, homework-heavy grading, generous partial credit, and .

Format shift

, while online reviews add study guides that are harder than tests.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload is usually manageable with , though several reviews still mention lots of homework and lecture-heavy courses.

Format shift

Online reviews include very low weekly time in one class, while week to lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Teaching is inconsistent because some students call him patient and clear, while others say lectures are confusing, monotone, or .

Format shift

Online evidence is limited but , while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix homework, discussion posts, quizzes, exams, study guides, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention study guides and tests, while in-person , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews show a and , while grading and tests are often very forgiving.

Main concern

Lecture quality can be unclear, so students may .

What students said

“Also, the tests were so easy I didn't even have to study for them to get 100%”
MATH142L
“His lectures can get super confusing & he makes lots of mistakes in his work.”
MATH192
“ , so do the all the hw & you'll pass.”
MATH192

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a slow or , and , but also technical issues and the need to watch lectures.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn independently when lectures are slow or hard to watch live.

What students said

“I attended 2 lectures throughout the semester because the class was super slow paced I learned everything at home”
Math-121
“ , but you should definitely watch the Zoom lectures that you miss.”
MATH294
“If you have !”
MATH135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because reviews cite open , and generous partial credit.

Open Note TestsLaptop AllowedEasy ExamsGenerous Partial CreditStudy Guides

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews strongly support student-friendly exams through open , and generous partial credit.

Open Note TestsLaptop AllowedEasy TestsGenerous Partial CreditLecture-Based Tests
“All of as well, we were even allowed to use our laptops during the tests!”
MATH142L
“the tests were so easy I didn't even have to study for them to get 100%”
MATH142L
“You're rarely penalized more than 1-2 points for getting an incorrect answer with work shown for .”
math-191L

Online

Online reviews mention study guides that prepare students well for tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Helpful Study GuidesTests Easier Than Study Guides
“The class study guides helped you prepare for the were exponentially harder then actual test.”
Math-121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to get an A, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy Grade Path

88/100

“ , so do the all the hw & you'll pass.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“His lectures can get super confusing & he makes lots of mistakes in his work.”

📝

86/100

“All of as well, we were even allowed to use our laptops during the tests!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want to get an A, .
  • Also, the tests were so easy I didn't even have to study for them to get 100%
  • Just do the

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made it so easy to understand.
  • His slow paced, monotone lecturing will absolutely put you to sleep.
  • His lectures are unclear, and and started learning the material on my own

Theme 3

🧑‍💻 About Independence

  • if you are a good self learner.
  • Nothing bad to say, just requires self-studying (but you're in college now, you should know that).
  • Read! Read! Read! You have to do by yourselves.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 18 reviews across several math courses and years, with enough detail to show both the and teaching inconsistency.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2945 reviews
MATH1924 reviews
MATH142L3 reviews
Math-1212 reviews
math-191L2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH1352 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 6 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1