AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Cheryl Martucci

COMSC · COMS100 · 100L · COMS101 · COMSC138 · COMSC101 · COMSC100100L · COMSC100 · CIS001 · COMSC100L · 100100L · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you already know the material and , and self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized courseUnclear gradingRambly lecturesHeavy workloadSelf-teaching required
  • Most students describe severe , and off-topic lectures.
  • Grades can still be high for experienced or self-directed students, but the learning experience is often poor.
  • Online reviews are especially harsh about poor , and little guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earn A grades easily, but , and random assignment issues make the grade feel unpredictable.

, while online reviews more often describe grading chaos and excessive work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The underlying computer literacy material can be easy for experienced students, but poor instruction makes it harder for beginners.

Both formats suggest experienced students can pass, but online students face more organization and guidance problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, and one review says students are required to sit in class.

, while online evidence stresses frequent check-ins and weekly obligations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and poor responsiveness.

Both formats are negative, with online reviews especially focused on poor course management and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students repeatedly describe , and zeros without explanation.

Format shift

Both formats report grading problems, with online reviews emphasizing missing or late grades and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students report lots of assignments, excessive work for , and .

Format shift

Online workload complaints are more intense, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe poor teaching, , and little useful guidance.

Format shift

In-person students focus on off-topic lectures and weak instruction, while online students focus on poor structure and lack of help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and occasional tests rather than a balanced exam structure.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and tests, while , and grading rubrics.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, , and poor teaching despite occasional praise for friendliness.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while .

What students said

“She DOES NOT teach during class, all assigns from PDFs from 06.”
COMSC101
“Every class she would talk about how she lived on an island and other nonsensical tangents instead of focusing on the material.”
CIS001

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing poor , and little help.

Main concern

Students report little guidance and unreliable course management.

What students said

“No instruction and no clarity.”
100
“online class is poorly organized, dropbox dates all over the place and she doesn't bother updating links between semesters so half of them don't work.”
100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but comments describe hard or and a major project, not a clearly student-friendly exam setup.

Hard TestsNo Study GuidesUnclear Online TestsLarge Final Project

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book, open-book, or proctoring policies.

Test Heavy MentionedFinal AssignmentGraded By Few Things
“Professor was not good. I had a very hard time passing this class”
CIS001
“ my final assignment and she walks over doesn't look at it”
CIS001

Online

, and tests that do not follow the book, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Hard TestsNo Study GuidesTests Do Not Follow Book
“ .”
COMSC100
“ .”
100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All I . She never did anything on time, every thing was so unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She clearly has no idea what she is doing with the class”

⚖️

24/100

“Your grade is really just a coin toss because I still have no idea what her criteria was.”

📚 Workload Cost

28/100

“she assigns 5x more work than any other teacher, an excessive amount for a 1 credit class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most of her "lectures" are filled with unrelated personal stories that and only waste time.
  • She DOES NOT teach during class, all assigns from PDFs from 06.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She doesn't have a .
  • Three quarters way into the semester students had not been given a single grade.
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Course Organization

  • Everything is so unorganized and she doesn't grade in time.
  • The due dates on the .
  • . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

98/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across online and years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 515
1 out of 566

Course coverage

COMSC10120 reviews
CIS0017 reviews
COMSC1006 reviews
100L3 reviews
COMS1013 reviews
Show 7 more courses
COMSC100L3 reviews
1002 reviews
100100L2 reviews
COMS1001 review
COMSC1 review
COMSC100100L1 review
COMSC1381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 15

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 7

C range

0

No reported values

D range

4

D+ 1 · D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2